This study compares an investigational contact lens care multi-purpose solution to a currently marketed multi-purpose solution.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
315
contact lens care solution
contact lens care solution
Unnamed facility
Mission Viejo, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF)
Slit Lamp Findings were assessed for each subject eye at baseline, 1-day, 1-week, 2-week, 1-month and 3-month follow-up evaluations. SLF consisted of Edema, Corneal Neovascularization, Cornela Staining, Injection, Tarsal Abnormalities and Other findings; each was graded on a 5-likert Scale (Grade: None, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate and Grade 4: Severe). The number of eyes with Grade 2 or higher across all time points for each SLF variable was reported.
Time frame: Up to 3 months Post Lens Wear
Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR) was assessed for each subject eye at 1-week, 2-week, 1-month and 3-month follow-up evaluations. The average Visual Acuity (LogMAR) for each time point and lens was reported.
Time frame: Up to 3 Months Post Lens Wear
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
Unnamed facility
Pittsburg, Kansas, United States
Unnamed facility
Jamestown, New York, United States
Unnamed facility
Vestal, New York, United States
Unnamed facility
Athens, Ohio, United States
Unnamed facility
Moon Township, Pennsylvania, United States
Unnamed facility
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
...and 4 more locations