Overtesting for Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in low risk Emergency Department(ED) patients can increase exposure of nondiseased patients to radiation, intravenous contrast and anticoagulation. This project addresses question of whether quantitative Pre-Test Probability(PTP) assessed from two validated web-based computer algorithms (the project "webtool"), can improve the diagnostic evaluation of adult patients with charted evidence of chest pain and dyspnea. After a validation phase, the main study will randomize patients to either the Standard care group or the Intervention group, which will receive the output of the ACS and PE webtool that includes the PTP estimates of ACS and PE and one of three recommendations regarding next steps: 1. No further testing, 2. Exclusion with a biomarker protocol, or 3. Immediate imaging +/- empiric anticoagulation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
550
Webtool provides the numeric PTP estimate for ACS and PE, and one of three testing recommendations. For ACS, PTP \<2.5% with low clinical suspicion and available follow-up, no further testing; PTP 2.5 to 5.5%: obtain a troponin I measurement at presentation and 120 minutes later, and if both are normal, no further testing; PTP \>5.5%: proceed to provocative testing. For PE, PTP\<2.5% with low clinical suspicion and available follow-up, no further testing; PTP 2.5-10%, obtain a quantitative D-dimer and if normal, no further testing. PTP 10-20%, proceed directly to pulmonary vascular imaging, and if PTP\>20% consider empiric anticoagulation with heparin if no contraindications.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Efficiency--Mean Cost of Care
Only costs at the enrollment hospital will be used, and only for patients who indicate that they did not visit any other hospital at the time of phone follow-up. Costs would exclude unexpected and unrelated events such as trauma. Additionally, estimated costs associated with the time required of the clinician to gather and enter the 17 variables are included.
Time frame: Day 30
Efficiency--Total Charge of Medical Care
Amount charged for medical care.
Time frame: Day 30
Safety--Radiation Dose to the Chest
in millisievert (mSv)
Time frame: Day 90
Effectiveness--Length of Stay in Hospital
Time frame: Day 7
Effectiveness--Length of Stay Emergency Department
Time frame: Day 7
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.