To describe if there are differences in the subjective, objective and electrophysiologic parameters of diabetic polyneuropathies at baseline, four (4) weeks, eight (8) weeks, and twelve (12) weeks after Cilostazol therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
47
100 mg, 200mg tablet Cilostazol
University of Santo Tomas Hospital
Manila, Philippines
Subjective neuropathy assessment by NSS (Neuropathy Symptom Scores)from Baseline (BS) to week 12 (W12) after Cilostazol therapy of the three (3) arms of the study.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Objective neuropathy assessment by NIS (Neuropathy Impairment Scores)from Baseline (BS) to week 12 (W12) after Cilostazol therapy of the three (3) arms of the study.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Electrophysiologic assessment by NCS (Nerve Conduction Studies) from Baseline (BS) to week 12 (W12) after Cilostazol therapy of the three (3) arms of the study.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To determine the relationship of peripheral neuropathy with peripheral vascular disease using the WIQ and the ABI from baseline to W12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To determine if there is improvement in subjective parameters of neuropathy as assessed by NSS and NSC (Neuropathy Symptoms and Change Questionnaire) from baseline to week 4 (W4), week 8 (W8) and week 12 (W12) after Cilostazol therapy.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To determine if there is improvement in objective parameters using NIS and NCS from baseline to W4, W8 and W12 after Cilostazol therapy.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To compare the effectivity of low dose (100mg) and high dose (200mg) Cilostazol based on subjective (NSS, NSC) and objective parameters (NIS, NCS) from baseline, to W4, W8 and W12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
To assess the safety of Cilostazol therapy.
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.