Recently, early biomarkers of renal interstitial fibrosis have been identified, amongst them de novo expression of vimentin by tubular epithelial cells, which is an intermediate filament, and the translocation of beta-catenin into their cytoplasm. These markers, when present, suggest that the epithelial cell undergoes a phenomenon well known as "epithelial to mesenchymal transition" (EMT) and could behaves like a myo-fibroblast. EMT is highly instrumental in several models of tissue fibrosis, including in the kidney. Actually, it has not only been demonstrated that these markers are detectable in the renal graft at an early time point post-transplant (i.e. as soon as three months), but also that the intensity of their expression correlates with the progression of interstitial fibrosis of the graft between 3 and 12 months
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
194
Certican® was supplied to the participating centers by Novartis for the whole duration of the study in the form of tablets containing 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25 mg and packaged in blister packs.
Neoral® was also supplied to participating centers for the entire duration of the study in the form of soft capsules of 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg, and packaged in blister packs.
Myfortic ® was supplied to the participating centers for the duration of the study in the form of 180 and 360 mg gastro-resistant, film-coated tablets. Myfortic® treatment was provided to patients preoperatively or within 24 hours post-transplantation according to the practices of the center. The starting dose was generally 1,440 mg/day, in 2 daily oral fractions, administered at 12 hour intervals up to randomization. Depending on the practices of the center and for the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, a maximum daily dose of 2160 mg of Myfortic® could be administered. In the Neoral® group, the daily dose of 1440 mg was maintained throughout the study. In the Certican® group, the dose was halved (i.e. 720 mg/day) on introducing Certican® and maintained at 720 mg/day until the end of the study. An increase in the daily dose of Myfortic® (in the Certican® group) was not authorized unless this was a temporary increase that did not exceed a period of 14 consecutive days.
The administration of Simulect® was part of the standard immunosuppressant therapy. This induction therapy was provided to patients in the form of commercial ampoules each containing 20 mg. Simulect® was administered to each patient at the dose of 20 mg on D0 and D4 post-transplantation.
An intravenous steroid treatment could be administered peri or intraoperatively according to local practice at each center. Oral steroid treatment was quickly introduced (in the week following transplantation) at a daily dose of 20 mg and was then reduced and continued throughout the study at a minimum dose of 5 mg/day.
Novartis Investigative Site
Caen, Cedex, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Angers, France, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Suresnes, France, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Amiens Cedex1, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Brest, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Créteil, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Grenoble, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, France
...and 13 more locations
Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Graft Fibrosis (Primary Comparison - ITT Population
Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) is the percentage (%) of participants with an increase \>= 1 in IF/TA grade according to Banff (2005 - 2007)according to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and by treatment groups. Grade I (the better): mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\<25% of cortical area) Grade II : moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (26-50% of cortical area) Grade III (the worse) : severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\>50% of cortical area)
Time frame: Month 3 (M3) and Month 12 (M12) post transplantation
Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA)
Incidence and severity of IF/TA according to 2005/2007 Banff classification system grades (grades l to lll). IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (\<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (\>50% of lesions).
Time frame: M3 and M12 post transplantation
Change in Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) Grade
Difference (M12 - M3) in IF/TA grade. IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (\<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (\>50% of lesions).
Time frame: M3 and M12 post transplantation
Risk Factors of IF/TA Progression
Composite factors regarding fibrosis progression at 12 months using a logistic regression model; the parameters initially considered concerned the demographic characteristics of both recipient and donor, transplantation characteristics, hypertension, diabetes, study treatments, immunosuppression, EMT, IF/TA, function at M3, the onset of acute rejection, the presence of anti-donor antibodies at M12, infections and BK virus viremia. Arteriolar hyaline thickening is thickening of the walls of arterioles by the deposition of homogeneous pink hyaline material. BPAR is biopsy proven acute rejection. TEM progression is the increase ≥ 1 of TEM score between Month 3 and Month 12
Time frame: M12 post transplantation
Change in Percentage of Interstitial Fibrosis (IF) by Numerical Quantification
Percentage of IF measured by numerical quantification. The IF percentage was transposed in grade according to the following rule: grade 0 for an IF % ≤5%, grade I for an IF % ranging from \>5% to \< 25%, grade II for an IF % ranging from 25 to 50%, grade III for an IF % \>50%. Interstitial graft fibrosis has been identified as the primary cause of graft loss following death with a functional graft \[3-5\].
Time frame: M3 and M12 post transplantation
Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Fibrosis Using Numerical Quantification
Comparisons according to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and immunosuppressive treatment
Time frame: M3 to M12 post transplantation
Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Status
Incidence and severity of EMT status. EMT status was determined centrally using the graft biopsy taken at 3 months. The result was quickly obtained (within 7 to 15 days) and sent to the company in charge of randomization in order to allocate each patient to a treatment group and to provide the investigator with this information without confirming EMT status.
Time frame: M3 and M12 post transplantation
Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Score
Incidence and severity of EMT score. The intensity of EMT markers expression present and detectable in the renal graft at an early stage following transplantation is known as EMT score. EMT score 0 (the best): \<1 EMT score 1 (the better): 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2: 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3: 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): \>50% of tubular atrophy
Time frame: M3 and M12 post transplantation
Change in EMT Score
Change (M12 - M3) in EMT Score. Progression in EMT score is defined as an increase by \>=1 of EMT score from M3 to M12. EMT score 0 (the best): \<1 EMT score 1 (the better) : 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2 : 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3 : 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): \>50% of tubular atrophy
Time frame: M3 and M12 post transplantation
Incidence (Number) of Subclinical Rejections and Borderline Lesions
Incidence of subclinical rejections and borderline lesions with regards to histological evidence of rejection with clinical findings. Subclinical rejections: rejection without clinical symptoms which is diagnosed by chance when a graft biopsy is performed. Clinically suspected BPAR: rejection suspected because of the presence of clinical symptoms (fever, pain, increase of creatinine) and then confirmed by the graft biopsy. Borderline lesions: suspicious for acute T-cell mediated rejection. This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of tubulitis with minor interstitial infiltration or interstitial infiltration with mild tubulitis.
Time frame: M3
Change From Baseline (M3) in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). LOCF = Last observation carried forward
Time frame: M3 (baseline) to M12 post transplantation
Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at M12 From Baseline (M3) - ANCOVA Model
The average patient renal function was evaluated on the basis of eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated MDRD formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²).
Time frame: Baseline (M3), M12
Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (Without Imputation)
One of the factors associated with EMT progression between M3 and M12 according to univariate analysis (ITT biopsies M3 \& M12).
Time frame: Month 3 (baseline), Month 12
Treatment Failures
A treatment failure is defined as biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death or a loss to follow up. It was assessed between randomization and 6 and 12 months post-transplantation.
Time frame: M6 and M12 post transplantation
Type of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).
Time frame: M6 and M12 post transplantation
Severity of BPAR
A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).
Time frame: M6 and M12 post transplantation
Incidence (Number) of BPAR
A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system.
Time frame: M6 and M12 post transplantation
Incidence (Number) of Participants With Graft Losses
If a participant underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was considered as the day of graft loss.
Time frame: M6 and M12 post transplantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.