RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving radiation therapy after surgery kill any remaining tumor cells and may be an effective treatment for breast cancer. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well radiation therapy works in treating women with locally recurrent breast cancer previously treated with repeat breast-conserving surgery.
OBJECTIVES: Primary * To evaluate skin, breast, and chest wall adverse events occurring within 1 year after completion of 3D-conformal partial-breast re-irradiation following repeat breast-preserving surgery in patients with locally recurrent breast carcinoma. Secondary * To evaluate the adverse events occurring after 1 year from the completion of re-irradiation and at any time. * To evaluate in-breast control rate in patients treated with this regimen. * To evaluate freedom-from-mastectomy rate in these patients. * To evaluate the rate of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in this patient population and to document eradication of CTCs by locoregional therapy. * To determine whether translational objective will correlate with eradication or presence of CTCs with in-breast recurrence and distant metastasis-free survival. * To evaluate cosmesis as judged by the patient and independent evaluation. * To evaluate distant metastasis-free survival, mastectomy-free survival, and overall survival of patients treated with this regimen. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients undergo 3-dimensional conformal accelerated partial-breast irradiation twice daily, 5 days a week, for 3 weeks. Some patients undergo blood sample collection at baseline and within 3 weeks after completion of radiotherapy for circulating tumor cells analysis. Some patients complete questionnaires on cosmesis at baseline and at 1 and 3 years following radiotherapy. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up periodically for 4-5 years and then every year thereafter.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
65
Radiation was to be delivered in 2 fractions per day, each of 1.5 Gy, separated by at least six hours, given in 15 consecutive working days to a total of 30 fractions and 45 Gy. Radiation was to be prescribed to the treatment unit isocenter, positioned at the approximate center of the planning target volume.
Number of Participants With Grade 3+ Treatment-related Skin, Fibrosis, and Breast Pain Adverse Events
Adverse events (AEs) were graded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. Based on a rate of 4% for the AEs of interest, a rate of ≥ 13% for these AEs with re-irradiation would be unacceptable. A sample size of 55 evaluable pts (eligible \& started protocol treatment) would provide: 86% power to conclude an unacceptable rate of the specified AEs, if the true AE rate was at least 13%; 93% probability to not conclude an unacceptable rate of the specified AEs, if the true AE rate is 4%. If ≥ 5 pts have treatment-related AEs, then the treatment-related AE rate was considered unacceptable.
Time frame: From the end of radiation to 1 year.
In-breast Recurrence
The definition of treatment failure is histologic evidence of recurrent carcinoma, either invasive or non-invasive (except LCIS) in the ipsilateral breast. Clinical evidence of carcinoma by physical examination and/or mammograms and/or MRI will not be construed as evidence of treatment failure without biopsy proof but will be considered as suspicious for recurrence. Ipsilateral breast recurrences will be considered local (infield) if they occur within the prescription isodose volume; they will be considered peripheral if they occur between the prescription isodose volume and a volume 2 cm outside of the prescription isodose volume. Ipsilateral recurrences will be considered non-contiguous or extra field if they are beyond the peripheral volume described above.
Time frame: From registration to date of recurrence or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 3 years.
Freedom From Mastectomy
Failure is mastectomy of the treated breast. Mastectomy rate at 3 years is reported, using the cumulative incidence with death as competing risk. Mastectomy-free survival is reported in outcome measure 10.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Arizona Center for Cancer Care - Peoria
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Roy and Patricia Disney Family Cancer Center at Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center
Burbank, California, United States
University of Colorado Cancer Center at UC Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, United States
JFK Medical Center
Atlantis, Florida, United States
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Cancer Institute at St. John's Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Central Maryland Oncology Center
Columbia, Maryland, United States
Tate Cancer Center at Baltimore Washington Medical Center
Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
...and 48 more locations
Time frame: From registration to date of mastectomy or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 3 years.
Number of Patients With Detectable/Undetectable/Unevaluable Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs)
CTCs in peripheral blood were assessed using the CellSearch (trademark) system. A stringent algorithm was used to classify cell images as a CTC. A CTC must express EpCAM \[epithelial cell adhesion molecule\] and not leukocyte lineage-specific antigens, exhibit cytoplasmic expression of cytokeratin, and contain a nucleus that binds DAPI \[4',6-doamidino-2-phenylindole\]. A cell image is not a CTC if any of the previous criterion are missing. A subject is categorized as "Detectable" if the patient had a CTC and "Undetectable" if the subject had no CTCs. If neither category could be determined, then the subject was categorized as "Unevaluable."
Time frame: Prior to the start of radiation and 3 weeks after last radiation treatment.
Treatment-related Adverse Events (AEs) Any Time
AEs were graded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. The overall highest grade for each patient was computed from all reported adverse events definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatment.
Time frame: From the end of radiation to end of follow-up. Will be evaluated at the time of the primary analysis.
Distant Metastasis-free Survival
Failures are appearance of ipsilateral axillary, infraclavicular, internal mammary, or supraclavicular recurrences; distant metastases confirmed radiographically and/or pathologically; or death due to any cause. Note that a distant metastases was only considered a treatment failure if accompanied by an in-breast recurrence.
Time frame: From registration to date of distant metastasis, death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patient have been potentially followed for 3 years.
Mastectomy-free Survival
Failure is mastectomy of the treated breast or death due to any cause. Mastectomy-free survival rate at three years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From registration to date of mastectomy, death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 3 years.
Overall Survival
Failure is death due to any cause. Three-year overall survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From registration to date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 3 years.
Treatment-related Adverse Events Occurring After One Year From Completion of Re-irradiation
AEs were graded with CTCAE version 4. The overall highest grade for each patient is computed from reported adverse events definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatment occurring after one year from completion of re-irradiation.
Time frame: After 1 year from the end of radiation.
Change in Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcomes From Baseline to 12-Months as Measured by the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS)
The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) is a 22-item tool to assess cosmetic results using patient self-reports. This brief self-report instrument has high reliability and validity, and it has been used in a variety of previous studies on recovery from breast cancer treatment. It is comprised of three subscales (functional status, cosmetic status, and breast specific pain). Response options for each BCTOS item form a four-point Likert scale evaluating the differences between the treated and the untreated breast (1=no, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=large difference). The score for each subscale is the mean of the ratings over all items belonging to that specific subscale. Change was calculated as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline. A positive change reflects a decline at 12 months and a negative change reflects an improvement at 12 months.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months from the start of radiation treatment.
Change in Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcomes From Baseline to 36-Months as Measured by the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS)
The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) is a 22-item tool to assess cosmetic results using patient self-reports. This brief self-report instrument has high reliability and validity, and it has been used in a variety of previous studies on recovery from breast cancer treatment. It is comprised of three subscales (functional status, cosmetic status, and breast specific pain). Response options for each BCTOS item form a four-point Likert scale evaluating the differences between the treated and the untreated breast (1=no, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=large difference). The score for each subscale is the mean of the ratings over all items belonging to that specific subscale. Change was calculated as the value at 36 months minus the value at baseline. A positive change reflects a decline at 36 months and a negative change reflects an improvement at 36 months.
Time frame: Baseline and 36 months from the start of radiation treatment.
Number of Patients With Good/Excellent Cosmesis Using the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Cosmetic Rating Scale
Physicians rated cosmesis using a 4 point NRG Oncology/RTOG established criteria scale: Excellent - when compared to the untreated breast or the original appearance of the breast, there is minimal/no difference in the size or shape of the treated breast. Good - there is a slight difference in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the opposite breast or the original appearance of the treated breast. Fair - obvious differences in the size and shape of the treated breast. This change involves quarter or less of the breast. Poor - marked change in the appearance of the treated breast involving more than a quarter of the breast tissue.
Time frame: Baseline,12, and 36 Months from the start of radiation treatment.
12-Month BCTOS Mean Subscale Scores by 12-Month NRG Oncology/RTOG Cosmetic Rating Scale
Patient-Reported BCTOS is comprised of 3 subscales (functional status, cosmetic status, breast specific pain). Responses for each item form a 4-point Likert scale evaluating the differences between the treated and untreated breast (1=no, 2=slight, 3=moderate, 4=large difference). Higher scores reflect poorer outcomes. Physicians rated cosmesis using a 4 point NRG Oncology/RTOG established criteria scale: Excellent - when compared to the untreated breast or the original appearance of the breast, there is minimal/no difference in the size or shape of the treated breast. Good - there is a slight difference in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the opposite breast or the original appearance of the treated breast. Fair - obvious differences in the size and shape of the treated breast. This change involves quarter or less of the breast. Poor - marked change in the appearance of the treated breast involving more than a quarter of the breast tissue.
Time frame: 12 Months from the start of radiation treatment.