Primary Objective: Phase 1: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD) of SAR650984 (Isatuximab). Phase 2 (stage 1): To evaluate the activity of single-agent Isatuximab at different doses/schedules and to select dose and regimen to further evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) of Isatuximab as single agent or in combination with dexamethasone. Phase 2 (stage 2): To evaluate the activity in terms of overall response rate (ORR) of Isatuximab at the selected dose/schedule from stage1, as single agent (ISA arm) and in combination with dexamethasone (ISAdex arm). Secondary Objectives: Phase 1: * To characterize the global safety profile including cumulative toxicities. * To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Isatuximab in the proposed dosing schedule(s). * To assess the pharmacodynamics (PD), immune response, and preliminary disease response. Phase 2 (stage 1): to evaluate the following objectives for Isatuximab as single agent: * Safety * Efficacy as measured by duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression free survival, overall survival. Phase 2 (stage 2): to evaluate the following objectives in each arm (ISA and ISAdex): * Safety * Efficacy as measured by duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression free survival, overall survival. * Participant-reported changes in health-related quality of life, symptoms of multiple myeloma and generic health status. * Pharmacokinetic profile of Isatuximab. * Immunogenicity of Isatuximab. * Investigate the relationship between CD38 receptor density and CD38 receptor occupancy (Stage 1 only) on multiple myeloma cells and parameters of clinical response.
The Phase 1 study duration for an individual participant included a screening period for inclusion of up to 2 weeks, treatment with Isatuximab QW (every week) or Q2W (every 2 weeks) unless discontinued earlier due to safety or disease progression. Participants were followed for a minimum of 30 days following the last use of study drug or more than 30 days in case of unresolved toxicity, or up to initiation of another anticancer treatment. The Phase 2 study duration for an individual participant included a screening period for inclusion of up to 3 weeks, then a treatment period and a follow up period. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable adverse reactions or other reasons for discontinuation. Participants were followed every 3 months following the last use of study drug until death or study cutoff, whichever came first.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
351
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral
Mayo Clinic Site Number : 840003
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
UCSF MS Center Site Number : 840005
San Francisco, California, United States
Emory University Site Number : 840009
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Chicago Site Number : 840010
Chicago, Illinois, United States
The University Of Michigan Site Number : 840022
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLTs were assessed using the national cancer institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. DLTs were defined as any Grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity (with the exception of allergic reaction/hypersensitivity), Grade 4 neutropenia and/or Grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting longer than 5 days, attributed to isatuximab. Any other toxicity that the Investigator and the Sponsor deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of the grade, was also considered as DLT.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 up to Day 14 of Cycle 2
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened during the on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose (maximum duration: 120 weeks )
Phase 2 Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR) According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria
OR defined as participants with stringent complete response (sCR) or complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) . Based on IMWG, CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level \<100 mg/24 hours; PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours; \>=50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of the M-protein criteria or a \>=50% reduction in plasma cells in place of M-protein if present at baseline.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression or death or data cut-off (maximum duration: 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for Stage 1b arm)
Phase 2 Stage 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response According to Updated IMWG Response Criteria
OR: participants with sCR or CR or VGPR or PR. As per updated IMWG, CR: Negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow; normal FLC ratio of 0.26-1.65 in participants with only FLC disease; sCR: CR and normal FLC ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level \<100 mg/24 hours, \>90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours; \>=50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of M-protein criteria or \>=50% reduction in plasma cells in place of M-protein if present at baseline.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause (maximum duration: 97 weeks)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment: Phase 1: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab Observed at the End of an Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi)
Ceoi was defined as the plasma concentration of Isatuximab at end of infusion. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed separately for dose 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg and not for 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 dose levels (reported under one arm, i.e. Phase 1: Isatuximab \<=1mg/kg in participant flow). Analysis was performed on PK population: participants who gave informed consent, received at least one dose (even if incomplete) of isatuximab, had an assessable PK parameter.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1: At the end of infusion
PK Assessment: Phase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Isatuximab
Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed separately for dose 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg and not for 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 dose levels (reported under one arm, i.e. Phase 1: Isatuximab \<=1mg/kg in participant flow). Analysis was performed on PK population.
Time frame: For Q2W:Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 3, 7, 24, 48 and 168 hr post-infusion; For QW: Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 4, 24, 48, 72 and 168 hr post-infusion
PK Assessment: Phase 1: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Tmax) of Isatuximab
Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed separately for dose 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg and not for 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 dose levels (reported under one arm, i.e. Phase 1: Isatuximab \<=1mg/kg in participant flow). Analysis was performed on PK population.
Time frame: For Q2W:Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 3, 7, 24, 48 and 168 hr post-infusion; For QW: Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 4, 24, 48, 72 and 168 hr post-infusion
PK Assessment: Phase 1: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Week 1, 2 and 3
Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed only for dose 1 mg/kg and not for 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg dose levels (reported under one arm, i.e. Phase 1: Isatuximab \<=1mg/kg in participant flow).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Karmanos Cancer Center Site Number : 840027
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic of Rochester Site Number : 840018
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Washington University School of Medicine Site Number : 840013
St Louis, Missouri, United States
The Cancer Center At Hackensack University Medical Site Number : 840011
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Site Number : 840014
New York, New York, United States
...and 49 more locations
Time frame: Week 1, 2 and 3
PK Assessment: Phase 1: Predicted Cumulative Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) of Isatuximab Over the First Week (0-168 Hours) (AUC1W)
Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed only for dose 1 mg/kg and not for 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg dose levels (reported under one arm, i.e. Phase 1: Isatuximab \<=1mg/kg in participant flow).
Time frame: For Q2W:Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 3, 7, 24, 48 and 168 hr post-infusion; For QW: Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 4, 24, 48, 72 and 168 hr post-infusion
PK Assessment: Phase 1: Predicted Cumulative Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) of Isatuximab Over the First 2 Weeks (0-336 Hours) (AUC2W)
Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed only for dose 1 mg/kg and not for 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg dose levels (reported under one arm, i.e. Phase 1: Isatuximab \<=1mg/kg in participant flow).
Time frame: For Q2W:Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 3, 7, 24, 48 and 336 hr post-infusion; For QW: Cycle 1,Day 1: pre-dose, 15 min after start of infusion, at the end of infusion, 4, 24, 48, 72 and 336 hr post-infusion
Pharmacodynamic (PD) Assessment: Phase 1: Change From Baseline in Serum/Plasma Markers
Serum/plasma markers included: tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1-β), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interferon-gamma (IFN-Gamma). Due to change in planned analysis, data for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and CD38 was not collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1
Immunogenicity Assessment: Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent And Treatment-Boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response
ADA response was categorized as: treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period (defined as the time from the first isatuximab administration until end of Phase 1) in participants without preexisting ADA (defined as: ADA that were present in samples drawn before treatment), including participants without pre-treatment (before treatment) samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment (before treatment) and post-treatment.
Time frame: Up to 120 weeks
Clinical Assessment: Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response and Clinical Benefit: Assessed Using European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria
OR defined as participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best overall response (BOR). Clinical benefit: participants with minimal response (MR) or better as BOR. BOR: best sequential response from start of treatment through the entire study excluding any time point following start of other treatment. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates, no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein, reduction in 24 h urinary M-protein by \>=90% or \<200mg, \>=50% reduction in size/number of soft tissue plasmacytomas, no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions. MR: 25 to 49% reduction in serum M-protein, 50-89% reduction in 24h urine M-protein, 25-49% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas, no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death (due to any cause) (maximum duration: 120 weeks)
Clinical Assessment: Phase 1: Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR: time from first response (PR or better) to first documented tumor progression/death. Progression as per EBMT: \>25% increase in serum monoclonal paraprotein level, which must also be an absolute increase of \>= 5 g/l: confirmed by \>=1 repeated investigation; \>25% increase in 24h urinary light chain excretion, which must also be an absolute increase of \>=200 mg/24 h:confirmed by \>=1 repeated investigation; \>25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate/on trephine biopsy, which must also be an absolute increase of \>= 10%; definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11·5 mg/dl or 2·8 mmol/l) not attributable to any other cause. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein, reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90% or \<200mg, \>=50% reduction in size/number of soft tissue plasmacytomas, no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions.
Time frame: From the date of first response to the date of first documentation of progression or death (due to any cause) (maximum duration: 120 weeks)
Clinical Assessment: Phase 1: Time to First Response (TTR)
TTR was defined as the time from first dose of isatuximab to first response (PR or better). PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein, reduction in 24 h urinary M-protein by \>=90% or \<200mg, \>=50% reduction in size/number of soft tissue plasmacytomas, no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions.
Time frame: From the date of first dose administration to the date of first response or death (due to any cause) (maximum duration: 120 weeks)
Clinical Assessment: Phase 1: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) (Karnofsky Performance Status)-Shift From Baseline Value to Best Value During Treatment
ECOG performance status was measured on a 4 point scale to assess participant's performance status. 0=Normal, fully functional; 1=Fatigue without significant decrease in daily activity; 2=Fatigue with significant impairment of daily activities or bed rest \<50% of waking hours; 3=Bed rest/sitting \>50% of waking hours; 4=Bedridden or unable to care for self, where lower score indicated good performance status. Number of participants with Baseline ECOG PS score and corresponding changes to the best values (categorized as: Baseline ECOG 1, During Treatment ECOG 0; Baseline ECOG 2, During Treatment ECOG 0; Baseline ECOG 2, During Treatment ECOG 1) are reported.
Time frame: At baseline, during treatment (Day 1 up to 120 weeks)
Clinical Assessment: Phase 1: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (Karnofsky Performance Status)-Shift From Baseline Value to Worst Value During Treatment
ECOG performance status was measured on a 4 point scale to assess participant's performance status. 0=Normal, fully functional; 1=Fatigue without significant decrease in daily activity; 2=Fatigue with significant impairment of daily activities or bed rest \<50% of waking hours; 3=Bed rest/sitting\>50% of waking hours; 4=Bedridden or unable to care for self, where higher score indicated worst performance status. Number of participants with Baseline ECOG PS score and corresponding changes to the worst values (categorized as: Baseline ECOG 0, During Treatment ECOG 1; Baseline ECOG 2, During Treatment ECOG 1; Baseline ECOG 0, During Treatment ECOG 2; Baseline ECOG 1, During Treatment ECOG 2; Baseline ECOG 0, During Treatment ECOG 3; Baseline ECOG 1, During Treatment ECOG 3; Baseline ECOG 2, During Treatment ECOG 3) are reported.
Time frame: At baseline, during treatment (up to 120 weeks)
Phase 2 Stage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened during the on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose (maximum duration: 414 weeks for Stage 1a and 92 weeks for Stage 1b)
Phase 2 Stage 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened during the on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose (maximum duration: 301 weeks)
Phase 2 Stage 1: Duration of Response
DOR:Time from date of 1st IAC determined response (\>= PR) that was subsequently confirmed, to date of first IAC determined PD/death, whichever happened earlier. updated IMWG criteria- PR:\>=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of M-protein criteria or a \>=50% reduction in plasma cells in place of M-protein if baseline was ≥30%. If present at baseline a \>=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; PD: Increase of 25% from lowest response value in any of following: Serum M-protein \>=0.5 g/dL absolute increase and/or urine M-protein \>=200 mg/24 hours absolute increase and/or \>10 mg/dL absolute increase in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, \>=10% bone marrow plasma cells (PCs), development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas, development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11·5 mg/dl) attributed to PC proliferation disorder.
Time frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death or data cut-off (maximum duration: 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for stage 1b arm)
Phase 2 Stage 2: Duration of Response
DOR: Time from date of 1st IAC determined response (\>= PR) that was subsequently confirmed, to date of 1st IAC determined PD or death, whichever happened earlier. As per updated IMWG criteria-PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours. ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of M-protein criteria or ≥50% reduction in plasma cells in place of M-protein if baseline was ≥30%. If present at baseline ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; PD: Increase of \>25% from lowest response value in any one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase must be \>0.5 g/dL)4 and/or Urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>200 mg/24 h) and/or \>10 mg/dL absolute increase in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, \>=10% bone marrow plasma cell, development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.
Time frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death or data cut-off (maximum duration: 97 weeks)
Phase 2 Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Clinical benefit: participants with sCR, CR, VGPR, PR or MR as per IMWG criteria, determined by IAC. CR: negative immunofixation on serum \& urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% PCs in bone marrow aspirates. sCR: CR + normal FLC ratio (0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. VGPR: serum \& urine M-component detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,\>=90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component level \<100mg/24hours; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours, ≥50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of the M-protein criteria or a ≥50% reduction in plasma cells in place of M-protein if baseline was ≥30%. If present at baseline, ≥50% size reduction in soft tissue plasmacytomas. MR:\>=25 but \<49% reduction in serum M-protein, reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, 25-49% size reduction in soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death (maximum duration: 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for stage 1b arm)
Phase 2 Stage 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Clinical benefit:participants with sCR, CR, VGPR, PR or MR, per IMWG criteria, determined by IAC. CR:negative immunofixation on serum \& urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates,normal FLC ratio(0.26-1.65) in participants with only FLC disease.sCR:CR+normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy.VGPR:serum \& urine M-component detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,\>=90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component level \<100mg/24h/,\>=90% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; PR:\>=50% reduction of serum M-protein, reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90%/\<200mg/24h,\>50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC in place of M-protein criteria, \>=50% reduction in size/number of soft tissue plasmacytomas. MR:\>=25 but \<49% reduction in serum M-protein,reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, 25-49% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death (maximum duration: 97 weeks )
Phase 2 Stage 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time interval from the date of first isatuximab administration to the date of the first IAC-confirmed disease progression (PD) or date of death due to any cause, whichever came first. As per IMWG criteria, PD: Increase of \> 25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be \> 0.5 g/dL), Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be \> 200 mg/24 h), \> 10mg/dL decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of the M-protein criteria, \>10% absolute percentage of bone marrow plasma cell, definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas, development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \> 11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of the first dose administration until progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for stage 1b arm)
Phase 2 Stage 2: Progression Free Survival
PFS was defined as the time interval from the date of first isatuximab administration to the date of the first IAC-confirmed disease progression or the date of death due to any cause, whichever came first. As per IMWG criteria, PD: Increase of \>25% from lowest response value in any one of the following: Serum M-component (the absolute increase must be \>0.5 g/dL)4 and/or Urine M-component (the absolute increase must be \>200 mg/24 h) and/or \>10 mg/dL decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of the M-protein criteria, ≥10% bone marrow plasma cell, development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of the first dose administration until progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 97 weeks)
Phase 2 Stage 1: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time interval from the date of first Isatuximab administration to death from any cause. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause (maximum duration 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for stage 1b arm)
Phase 2 Stage 2: Overall Survival
OS was defined as the time interval from the date of first Isatuximab administration to death from any cause. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause (maximum duration: 97 weeks)
Phase 2 Stage 1: Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores: Global Health Status
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain) \& other single items. For each item, high score = high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health \& quality of life, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 \& 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and End of Treatment (EOT: anytime up to 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for stage 1b arm)
Phase 2 Stage 1: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Scores: Disease Symptom Subscale Score
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with MM. It has 4 subscales: body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). Disease symptoms subscale used 4-point scale ranged from 1= 'Not at All' to 4= 'Very Much'. Scores were averaged, and transformed to 0 -100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL) and lower score = less symptoms and more HRQL.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and EOT (anytime up to 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for stage 1b arm)
Phase 2 Stage 1: Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Generic Health Status - Visual Analogue Scale Scores
EQ-5D was a standardized HRQL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, and EOT (anytime up to 77 weeks for Stage 1a arms and 53 weeks for stage 1b arm)
Pharmacokinetic Assessment: Phase 2 Stage 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of Isatuximab Over 1 Week Interval
Time frame: Pre-dose, at the end of infusion, 1 hour and 168 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetic Assessment: Phase 2 Stage 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of Isatuximab Over 2 Weeks Interval
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1: pre-dose, at the end of infusion, 168 and 336 hours post-infusion
Pharmacokinetic Assessment: Phase 2 Stage 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of Isatuximab Over 4 Weeks Interval
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1: pre-dose, at the end of infusion, 168, 336, and 672 hours post-infusion
Pharmacokinetic Assessment: Phase 2 Stage 2: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab Before Treatment Administration (Ctrough)
Time frame: At Days 7, 14 and 28
Pharmacokinetic Assessment: Phase 2 Stage 2: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab Based on Ctrough
Ctrough is the plasma concentration observed before treatment administration. For 1st category, the accumulation ratio was calculated by dividing Ctrough value of Cycle 2 Day 1 by Cycle 1 Day 8 and for second category, accumulation ratio was calculated by dividing Ctrough value of Cycle 4 Day 1 by Cycle 1 Day 8.
Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 1; Cycle 1, Day 8; Cycle 4, Day 1
Immunogenicity Assessment: Phase 2 Stage 2: Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies to Isatuximab
ADA response was categorized as: treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period (defined as the time from the first isatuximab administration until end of Phase 2 Stage 2) in participants without preexisting ADA (defined as: ADA that were present in samples drawn before treatment), including participants without pre-treatment (before treatment) samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment (before treatment) and post-treatment.
Time frame: Up to 97 weeks