The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of D-cycloserine for improving social impairment in child with pervasive developmental disorders (PDD).
This study will evaluate the efficacy of D-Cycloserine given 30 minutes prior to each of 10 weekly Social Skills Training Sessions for the treatment of social impairment in children (ages 5-11 years) with PDD during a randomized placebo-controlled trial. This will examine our central hypothesis that D-cycloserine will enhance learning of social skills in children with PDD's.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
68
50 mg dose administered 30 minutes prior to each of the ten Social Skill Training Sessions
Placebo pill administered 30 minutes prior to each of the ten Social Skill Training Sessions
Riley Hospital for Children
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Change
The 65-item SRS is a standardized measure of the core symptoms of autism. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale. The score of each individual item is summed to create a total raw score. A total scores results are as follows: 0-62: Within normal limits 63-79: Mild range of impairment 80-108: Moderate range of impairment 109-149: Severe range of impairment
Time frame: Completed at Baseline and Week 11
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) at Follow-Up
The 65-item SRS is a standardized measure of the core symptoms of autism. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale. The score of each individual item is summed to create a total raw score. A total scores results are as follows: 0-62: Within normal limits 63-79: Mild range of impairment 80-108: Moderate range of impairment 109-149: Severe range of impairment
Time frame: Completed at Week 22
Clinical Global Impressions Improvement Scale Responder Analysis
The CGI Global Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician-rate scale designed to take into account all factors to arrive at an assessment of severity and response to treatment, including parent report, parent-rated measures, teacher-rated measures, and clinician-rated measures. The CGI-I is rated from 1 to 7 (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse) at a single time-point. The CGI-I was completed at each visit, but only at week 11 were those subjects classified as "much" or "very much improved" defined as responders and all other classifications will be regarded as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 11
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.