The technique of transplanting progenitor cells into a region of damaged myocardium, termed cellular cardiomyoplasty, is a potentially new therapeutic modality designed to replace or repair necrotic, scarred, or dysfunctional myocardium. Ideally, graft cells should be readily available, easy to culture to ensure adequate quantities for transplantation, and able to survive in host myocardium; often a hostile environment of limited blood supply and immunorejection. Whether effective cellular regenerative strategies require that administered cells differentiate into adult cardiomyocytes and couple electromechanically with the surrounding myocardium is increasingly controversial, and recent evidence suggests that this may not be required for effective cardiac repair. Most importantly, transplantation of graft cells should improve cardiac function and prevent adverse ventricular remodeling. To date, a number of candidate cells have been transplanted in experimental models, including fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes, embryonic stem cell-derived myocytes, tissue engineered contractile grafts, skeletal myoblasts, several cell types derived from adult bone marrow, and cardiac precursors residing within the heart itself. There has been substantial clinical development in the use of whole bone marrow and skeletal myoblast preparations in studies enrolling both post-infarction patients, and patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. The effects of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have also been studied clinically. Currently, bone marrow or bone marrow-derived cells represent highly promising modality for cardiac repair. The totality of evidence from trials investigating autologous whole bone marrow infusions into patients following myocardial infarction supports the safety of this approach. In terms of efficacy, increases in ejection fraction are reported in the majority of the trials. Chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction resulting from heart disease is a common and problematic condition; definitive therapy in the form of heart transplantation is available to only a tiny minority of eligible patients. Cellular cardiomyoplasty for chronic heart failure has been studied less than for acute MI, but represents a potentially important alternative for this disease.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
31
Biological: Autologous human mesenchymal stem cells (Auto-hMSCs) Participants will receive 40 million cells/mL delivered in either a dose of 0.5 mL per injection x 1 injection for a total of 0.2 x 10\^8 (20 million) Auto-hMSCs, a dose of 0.5 mL per injection x 5 injections for a total of 1 x 10\^8 (100 million) Auto-hMSCs, or a dose of 0.5 mL per injection x 10 injections for a total of 2 x 10\^8 (200 million) Auto-hMSCs. The injections will be administered transendocardially during cardiac catheterization using the Biocardia Helical Infusion Catheter.
Biological: Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells (Allo-hMSCs) Participants will receive 40 million cells/mL delivered in either a dose of 0.5 mL per injection x 1 injection for a total of 0.2 x 10\^8 (20 million) Allo-hMSCs, a dose of 0.5 mL per injection x 5 injections for a total of 1 x 10\^8 (100 million) Allo-hMSCs, or a dose of 0.5 mL per injection x 10 injections for a total of 2 x 10\^8 (200 million) Allo-hMSCs. The injections will be administered transendocardially during cardiac catheterization using the Biocardia Helical Infusion Catheter.
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Incidence of TE-SAE Define as Composite of Death, Non-fatal MI, Stroke, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure, Cardiac Perforation, Pericardial Tamponade, Ventricular Arrhythmias >15 Sec. or With Hemodynamic Compromise or Atrial Fibrillation
Time frame: One month post-catheterization
CT Infarct Size From Early Enhanced Defect: - Difference Between the Baseline and 13-month
Percentage change from 13-months post-catheterization to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline Month 13 post-catheterization
CT Measure of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Time frame: Baseline Month 13 post-catheterization
CT Measure of End Diastolic Volume
Time frame: Baseline Month 13 post-catheterization
CT Measure of End Systolic Volume
Time frame: Baseline Month 13 post-catheterization
CT Measure of Scar Size as % of LV Mass
Time frame: Baseline Month 13 post-catheterization
Change in Distance Walked in 6-minutes From Baseline.
Time frame: 12-months
Change in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Total Score
The Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire uses a 6-point, zero to five, Likert scale. The total score is the sum of the 21 responses. The total score is considered the best measure of how heart failure and treatments impact a patients quality of life. The max score is 105, minimum score is 0. A lower score is considered a better quality of life.
Time frame: 12 months
Change in New York Heart Association Class at 12-months
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.