The study is designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of daily treatment for 12 weeks of oral administration of a delayed release, locally delivered 6MP (mercaptopurine) drug (80 mg), as compared to standard Purinethol (at a dose of 1-1.5 mg/kg/body weight), in alleviating the clinical, immunological and mucosal signs and symptoms of moderately active Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease (CD) therapy is aimed at reducing inflammation via induction of remission after a flare-up and maintenance of the remission for as long as possible. Therapies commonly used for inducing remission are steroids and anti-TNF-a. Standard 6MP, on the other hand, has a slow onset of action and requires several months of administration before its therapeutic effects become apparent. Therefore, 6MP is typically used as maintenance therapy, rather than for remission. Furthermore, serious AE's associated wtih 6MP include leucopenia, hepatoxicity, pancreatitis and bone marrow suppression, requiring lowering of dose or treatment discontinuation. The Teva DR-6MP project was designed to evaluate a new oral 6MP formulation that would address these limitations. The slow action of standard 6MP, precluding its use as a treatment for induction of remission, would be offset by a faster-disintegrating, more soluble formulation with an enteric coating for targeted ileal delivery. This new formulation designed to open at the terminal ileum, the most commonly affected area of CD bowel involvement, could deliver higher effective local concentrations of drug to the site most affected by CD, stimulating an effective local immunological response, resulting in a cascade of widespread immunological activity, evoking an induction of remission. The safety of standard 6MP would be improved upon by the fact that negligible levels of the DR-6MP formulation have been observed in the plasma, obviating the toxicities associated with systemic 6MP. Moreover, since the DR-6MP dose is fixed and not subject to patient weight, nor potentially, side-effects, the dose adjustments required for up-titration to optimal dose, or down-titration due to toxicity, could be avoided. Previous small, pilot proof-of-concept clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic studies of the DR-6MP formulation demonstrated the potential for induction of remission, mucosal healing, systemic immunological improvement and lower systemic side-effects. The current study is designed to repeat the earlier studies under larger, more rigorous conditions in a randomized, double-blind fashion at multiple sites to ascertain if the initial encouraging results could be repeated. Moreover, a higher dose of 6MP (80 mg) will be tested to ascertain if presumably higher local concentrations at the disease site can evince a more robust clinical effect.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
70
Delayed Release oral tablet for ileal drug delivery, 80 mg, once nightly before bedtime, for 12 weeks. Since the study drug must be blinded, patients randomized to this arm will receive the following: 80 mg DR-6MP: 2 active 40 mg DR-6MP tablets.
Oral tablet(s) to be administered once daily in the AM, for 12 weeks.Purinethol is available only as a 50 mg tablet; patients randomized to this arm will receive varying doses (dependent on baseline body weight and AE profile) throughout the study;and study drug to be blinded. Therefore, patients randomized to this arm to receive combination active Purinethol/comparable placebo. For ex: 50 mg Purinethol= 1 active 50 mg tablet, 2 comparable placebo tablets; 100 mg Purinethol = 2 active 50 mg tablets, 1 placebo tablet; 150 mg Purinethol = 3 active 50 mg tablets. Patients receiving 75 mg or 125 mg will receive alternating daily doses of 50 and 100 mg, or 100 and 150 mg, respectively, to arrive at a weekly average dose of 75 mg or 125 mg.
Ha'emek Medical Center
Afula, Israel
Bnai Zion Hospital
Haifa, Israel
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, Israel
Hadassah Medical Center
Jerusalem, Israel
Proportion of subjects with clinical response at study end
Clinical response is defined as a reduction in CDAI score (Crohn's Disease Activity Index) by 100 points from baseline, or remission (CDAI score \<150),even if it is achieved with reduction of CDAI score of less than 100 points from baseline
Time frame: 12 weeks
Time to clinical response
Although the primary outcome is to assess the proportion of patients with clinical response at Week 12, we are also interested to see how early during treatment (i.e., between weeks 2 and 12), was this clinical response actually achieved for each treatment group, and if it was maintained until the end of the study (week 12)
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8 or 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Shaarei Tzedek Medical Center
Jerusalem, Israel
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, Israel
Holy Family Hospital
Nazareth, Israel
Kaplan Medical Center
Rehovot, Israel
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, Israel
Sheba Medical Center
Tel Litwinsky, Israel
...and 1 more locations