The primary objectives of this study are to: 1) Evaluate the efficacy of CP 601,927 compared to placebo in the augmentation of antidepressant therapy (ADT) in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). 2) Evaluate the safety and tolerability of CP 601,927 in patients with MDD on ADT.
The study was stopped at interim analysis in August 2011, as stopping criteria for futility were met. There was no statistically significant change on the primary efficacy scale in favor of the drug. There was a very small chance that any additional data could change the study overall outcome. There were no concerns regarding subject safety.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
297
CP-601,927 1-2 mg twice per day, oral 1 mg tablets, for 6 weeks.
Matching placebo tablets, taken orally, twice per day, for 6 weeks.
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) - Total Score at Week 14
MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS had a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total numeric range of scores from 0 (depressive symptoms absent) to 60 (numerically highest level of depressive symptoms).
Time frame: Week 8 (double-blind baseline ) and week 14 (week 6 of double-blind phase)
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) - Total Score at Weeks 9 Through 13
MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS had a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total numeric range of scores from 0 (depressive symptoms absent) to 60 (numerically highest level of depressive symptoms).
Time frame: Week 8 (double-blind baseline) and weeks 9 through 13
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Hamilton Depression Scale 25-item (HAM-D25) - Total Score at Weeks 9 Through 14
The HAM-D25 is the 25-item version of a scale used to assess the range of depressive symptoms including depressed mood, work and activities, sleep, suicidal thinking, psychomotor agitation/retardation, appetite, sexual interest, anxiety, somatic symptoms, and cognitive symptoms. The items on the HAM-D were rated on a scale of 0-2 or 0-4, for a total numeric range of scores from 0 (depressive symptoms absent) to 72 (numerically highest level of depressive symptoms).
Time frame: Weeks 8 (double-blind baseline) through 14
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Bech Melancholia Subscale Score at Weeks 9 Through 14
The Bech Melancholia is sum of scores on 6 items (items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13) pertaining to melancholia within HAM-D. The items are rated on a scale of 0-4, higher scores reflecting greater severity. Total possible score is 0-24.
Time frame: Weeks 8 (double-blind baseline) through 14
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Arkansas Psychiatric Clinic Clinical Research Trials, P.A.
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Southwestern Research Incorporated
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Collaborative Neuroscience Network, Inc.
Garden Grove, California, United States
Synergy Clinical Research Center
National City, California, United States
Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
San Diego, California, United States
Radiant Research, Inc.
Denver, Colorado, United States
Comprehensive Psychiatric Care
Norwich, Connecticut, United States
William B. Backus Hospital Satellite Blood Draw
Norwich, Connecticut, United States
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC
Maitland, Florida, United States
...and 48 more locations
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) at Weeks 9, 10, 12, and 14
CGI-S was defined as 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 8 (double-blind baseline) and weeks 9, 10, 12, 14
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Sheehan Irritability Scale (SIS) Total Score at Weeks 11 and 14
The SIS is to rate suffering with regard to irritability symptoms. The degree to which irritability interferes with work, social and family function is also queried. The total SIS score is the sum of 7 items. Each item is rated on a scale of 0-10, for a total numeric range of scores from 0 (not at all) to 70 (extremely). The SIS also records the number of days impaired by irritability.
Time frame: Weeks 8 (double-blind baseline), 11 and 14
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Weeks 11 and 14
SDS is defined as a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment including work/school, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. Items are rated on a scale of 0-10 visual analog scale (0=not at all impaired, 10=extremely impaired), for a total numeric range of scores from 0 (not at all impaired) to 30 (extremely impaired).
Time frame: Weeks 8 (double-blind baseline), 11 and 14
Change From Double-blind Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Subscale Score at Weeks 11 and 14
SDS subscale is defined as a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment in 3-item including work/school, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. Items are rated on a scale of 0-10 visual analog scale, for a total numeric range of scores from 0 (not at all impaired) to 30 (extremely impaired).
Time frame: Weeks 8 (double-blind baseline), 11 and 14
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Total Score at Weeks 9, 10, 12 and 14
CGI-I was defined as a 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Weeks 8 (double-blind baseline) 9, 10, 12 and 14
Number of Participants With Remission at Weeks 9, 10, 12 and 14
Remission was defined as response plus an absolute MADRS total score of less than or equal to 10 plus a CGI-I score less than 2 ('much' or 'very much' improved).
Time frame: Weeks 9, 10, 12 and 14
Number of Participants With Response at Weeks 9 Through 14
Response was defined as greater than 50 percent reduction from double-blind baseline in MADRS total score.
Time frame: Weeks 9 through 14
Population Pharmacokinetics
Population pharmacokinetic analysis involved mixed effects modeling using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) software. The intent of this analysis was to establish a basic population pharmacokinetic model for CP-601,927 and to determine inter-individual and residual variability in population clearance, and volume of distribution of drug. Relationship of demographic variables (gender, age, body weight, height and ethnicity), concomitant medications and measures of altered hepatic and renal function were examined by fitting measured CP-601,927 concentrations
Time frame: Weeks 11,12 and 14
Plasma CP-601,927 Concentration
Blood samples were collected for plasma CP-601,927 concentration analysis which was summarized by mean and standard deviation.
Time frame: Week 11, 12 and 14