Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Azathioprine for the Extra-renal Lupus Manifestations

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute240 enrolled

Overview

Azathioprine is still considered the treatment of choice for the non-renal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with an estimated efficacy of 45%.Recently, several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil/enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in those cases, but so far, no controlled, randomized comparative study between the two drugs has been conducted. The aim is to perform a randomized, controlled, phase III/IV study comparing enteric-coated mycophenolate (ECMs) with azathioprine for induction and maintenance therapy of the non-renal manifestations of SLE. Methods: Patients with non-renal SLE flares (SLEDAI≥6 and/or BILAG o 2B refractory to full doses of hydroxychloroquine and prednisolone (≥10 mg/d) or with relapsing flares will be included. Patients will be stratified according the flare severity (moderate (SLEDAI\<12)-severe (SLEDAI≥12)) and randomized (1:1) into two groups of treatment, EMCs (2gr/d) or AZA (2-2.5mg/kg/d) according to TMPT levels for 6 months. Dose will be progressively tapered based on clinical response up to completing a year of treatment. The main aim is the percentage of complete remission achieved ((SLEDAI \<4 and/or absence of any BILAG A o B) at week 12 and 24 for moderate and severe flares, respectively. Secondary objectives include evaluating the reduction in the steroid requirement, number of flares post-treatment, effect on the biological parameters, and impact on quality of life, damage and drug safety. To detect a 20% difference between the two drugs with a 80% statistical power (0.05 alpha error), considering a follow up loss of 20%, a total of 240 patients is required.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

240

Conditions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 65 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Age\>18 years * Fulfill at least 4 of the 11 criteria for the ACR classification * Any extra-renal flare with an SLEDAI\>6 and/or one BILAG A or 2 B * Oral corticosteroids\>10 mg/day and HCQ \> 400 mg/day for at least 30 days prior to inclusion Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of active renal disease * Previous intolerance or hypersensibility to any of the active components * Active infection * Unmeasurable levels of TMPT * Pregnancy * Presence of a severe flare that requires other immunosuppressive treatment for its control * Any Psychiatric or social condition that did not ensure the patient´s follow-up and patient´s collaboration * Previous treatment with EC-MPS or Azathioprine in the last 2 months * Previous treatment with biological therapy in the last 3 months for anti-TNF therapy or in the last year for anti-CD20 therapy * ALT or GPT \>120 UI/mL non-lupus related in the last 30 days * Leucopenia \<1000x10E6 non-lupus related in the last 30 days * Symptoms related to other medical conditions non-lupus related such as antiphospholipid syndrome.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Obtention of complete remission

Complete remission will be defined by a SLEDAI\<4 and/or absence of any BILAG A or B after 12 weeks of treatment

Time frame: 24 months

Secondary Outcomes

To evaluate the safety, improvement in biological parameters and reduction of number of extra-renal flares.