Human experimental pain models are useful in understanding the mechanisms underlying clinical pain conditions and can be used to test the analgesic efficacy of drugs used in the management of pain. Once established these models can be used as mechanism biomarkers in early development clinical studies to establish proof of mechanism for novel compounds. The cold pain model is a mechanistic pain biomarker with potential application in proof of mechanism studies. In this study we aim to set up this cold pain model at a Clinical Research Unit and demonstrate we can effectively screen subjects for this model and examine the effect of morphine, diphenhydramine, and gabapentin in the cold pain model.
Cold pain methodology development
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
19
Capsule, single 1200mg dose
Tablet, single 50mg dose
IV, single 10mg dose
Placebo formulations (Capsule, tablet, IV to match the active treatments and to be administered in a double-dummy fashion).
Pfizer Investigational Site
Brussels, Belgium
Average Pain (0-120 Seconds): Cold Pain Test Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Area under the cold pain test Visual Analog Scale (VAS) time curve (AUCcpt 0 to 120 seconds \[sec\]) averaged over the 120 sec for each time point assessed. Participant adjusted 100 millimeter (mm) electronic VAS with range of "no pain" (0) to "maximum pain" (100) at the anchor endpoints of the scale and "moderate pain" at the midpoint. Pain reported while non-dominant hand was placed in thermostatically controlled water bath at 2±1°C for a maximum of 120 sec.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose
Interpolated Average Pain (0-8 Hours)
Interpolated average pain (0 to 8 hours): area under the curve (AUC) of average pain (0 to 120 seconds) recorded at each of the time points taken over 8 hour time period divided by 8.
Time frame: Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Vital Signs
Supine blood pressure measured to nearest millimeter of mercury (mmHg), pulse rate measured with automated device or manually in the brachial/radial artery for at least 30 seconds.
Time frame: Predose, Day 1, Day 2 each treatment period, follow-up visit (at least 7 days after last dosing)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings on Physical Examination
Full physical examination consisting of an examination of the abdomen, cardiovascular systems, lungs, lymph nodes, mouth, musculoskeletal and neurological systems, skin, extremities, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat and thyroid gland.
Time frame: Pre-dose and follow-up visit (at least 7 days after last dosing)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings on Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Standard 12-lead ECG performed after subject had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position.
Time frame: Pre-dose and follow-up visit (at least 7 days after last dosing)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Haematology, Clinical Chemistry, Urinalysis Results
Standard haematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis safety laboratory tests.
Time frame: Pre-dose, follow-up visit (at least 7 days after last dosing)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Cardiac Monitoring Results
Continuous cardiac monitoring during intervenous (IV) infusion dosing (morphine or placebo).
Time frame: Pre-dose through duration of IV infusion dosing
Number of Participants With Abnormal Pulse Oxymetry Results
Pulse oxymetry to monitor percentage of hemoglobin saturated with oxygen during intervenous (IV) infusion dosing (morphine or placebo).
Time frame: Predose through duration of IV infusion dosing
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.