This randomized, blinded, parallel arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) versus adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are intolerant of methotrexate or where continued treatment with methotrexate was considered inappropriate. Patients were randomized to receive either tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks plus placebo subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks, or adalimumab 40 mg sc every 2 weeks plus placebo iv every 4 weeks. Treatment was anticipated to last 24 weeks. With regard to the blind, the study nurse was unblinded due to the nature of the treatment administration, but the investigator and the patient remained blinded.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
326
The maximum dose was 800 mg for patients weighing more than 100 kg. Tocilizumab was infused into an arm vein over a 1-hour period.
Unnamed facility
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Unnamed facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unnamed facility
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis (RA) and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The analysis was adjusted for stratification factors of duration of RA (≤ 2 years and \> 2 years) and region (US and non-US).
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 24
The percentage of patients who achieved remission of their rheumatic arthritis at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score \< 2.6, is reported.
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] ≤ 3.2) at Week 24
The percentage of patients who had low rheumatic arthritis disease activity at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score of 3.2 or less, is reported.
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24
Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the extreme left end of the line "no disease activity" \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\] and the extreme right end "maximum disease activity"; patient assessment of pain in previous the 24 hours on a VAS (extreme left end of the line "no pain" and the extreme right end "unbearable pain"); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 24
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 24
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
San Diego, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Trumbull, Connecticut, United States
Unnamed facility
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
...and 72 more locations