This is a Phase I clinical trial to determine whether orally administered APL A12 at one or more doses is superior to placebo in effecting a 25% reduction in interferon (IFN) stimulation index in 1(II)-stimulated culture of peripheral blood mononuclear (PBMC) obtained from patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), which will be the primary outcome variable. In an effort to learn more about the mechanism of action of APL A12, the investigators will assess Th1/Th2/Th3 cytokine production in supernatants from 48h and 144h cultures of PBMC stimulated by 1(II) and by APL A12 above. The investigators will assess function of CD4+ CD25+ T regs to determine whether APL A12 improves their suppressive function. Flow cytometry combined with intracellular cytokine staining will be used in an effort to determine which T cell subset(s) is/are experiencing shifts in cytokine expression.
The study will have 3 treatment arms each with 10 patients who have demonstrated T cell immunity to CII and have an in vitro response to APL A12 at the screening visit. Patients will be randomized to one of the 3 treatment arms. Each of the 3 treatments will be given for 16 weeks. In keeping with a sequential dose escalation strategy, the originally proposed randomization scheme will be modified so that subjects will be randomized to receive either the lowest dose (30 mg) or placebo (Block 1), followed by the next dose (50 mg) or placebo (Block 2). We will begin with the lowest dose (30 g/day) and enroll 6 to receive 30 g/day APL A12 and 2 to receive placebo for 16 weeks. Results will be reported to the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) for a decision to proceed to the next block based on indications of safety. If this dose does not cause adverse events or toxicity or worsens RA, we will proceed to enroll patients to receive 30 ug, or 50 g/day APL A12 or placebo for 16 weeks. A total of 32 subjects will be randomized to obtain 24 subjects who complete the study. Recruitment was difficult. Only 22 patients were randomized. There were not enough 50mcg patients enrolled so 2 treatment groups was analyzed. Arm 1 included 30 and 50 mcg and Arm 2 represents the patients that received placebo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
22
Memphis VA Medical Center, Memphis, TN
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Number and Percent of Participants With Reduction of Immunity to Collagen Type-II After APLA-12 Treatment.
The primary outcome variable is the presence of a \> 25% reduction in net IFN concentration in supernatants of 1(II)-stimulated PBMC cultures from baseline after 16 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Flow Cytometry
Change in Percentage of CD4+CD25+FoxP3 T regulatory cells, CD4+IL-10+ cells, CD4+ IL-4+ cells, CD4+IL17+ cells. Some patients had only had enough blood collected at 8 weeks or 16 weeks or dropped out after 8 weeks, and we used/combined what was available.
Time frame: baseline and 8 or 16 weeks
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at 0 and 16 Weeks Follow up
Interpretation of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores \< 2.8 indicate remission; \>2.8 and \<= 10 indicates low disease activity; \>10 and \<= 22 indicates moderate disease activity; \>22 indicates high disease activity.
Time frame: 0 and16 weeks
Change in Cytokine Profile From Baseline and 16 Weeks
Cytokines assessed are IL-10, IL-13, IL-5, IL-1B, IL-9, IL-17A, IL-6, IL-21, TGF-B, TNFa,and MIP3A.
Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks
Change in IgG and IgA Immunoglobulin From Baseline to 8 or 16 Weeks
The change was computed between baseline and 8 or 16 weeks, whichever was available.
Time frame: baseline and 8 or 16 wks
Neutrophils Counts at 0 and 16 Weeks
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo:Complete blood count Neutrophil count to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
A12 Treated vs Placebo of Monocytes.
Laboratory Results of A12 treated vs Placebo of Monocytes to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: Baseline and 16 wks
Eosinophils
Laboratory Results of A12 treated vs Placebo of Eosinophils to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo: Lymphocytes
Measure to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo: Basophils
Measure to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Hematocrit
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo-Total Immunoglobulin (Immature Granulocytes)
Measure to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW)
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo RDW is a measure of the range of variation of red blood cell volume reported as part of a standard blood count to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks
Hemaglobin
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Red Blood Cells
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
White Blood Count
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Platelets
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
AST, ALT and Alkaline Phosphatase
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Ca, BUN, Glucose,Creatinine, Total Bilirubin
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo-CMP to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Sodium, Potassium and Chloride
Laboratory results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Total Protein, Albumin
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
C-reactive Protein
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Rheumatoid Factor
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Sedimentation Rate
Laboratory results of A12 vs Placebo to determine whether APL has any effect on routine blood counts, chemistries, electrolytes, immunoglobulin to measure potential toxicities
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Laboratory Results of A12 vs Placebo Anti-CCP Antibody
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and Physician Global Assessment
Patient and Physician (PI) Assessments both range from 0-10 with 10 being the most disease activity
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ)
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) 0-8 with 8 being the most activity
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Duration of Morning Stiffness in Joints
Duration of morning stiffness in the joints, in minutes.
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
CDAI
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 0-76 mm. Interpretation of CDAI scores \< 2.8 indicate remission; \>2.8 and \<= 10 indicates low disease activity; \>10 and \<= 22 indicates moderate disease activity; \>22 indicates high disease activity.
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Vital Signs-Temperature
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Vital Sign - Pulse
heartbeats per minute
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Weight
Weight in kg
Time frame: 0-16 weeks
Vitals - Blood Pressure
measurement of blood pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: 0 weeks and 16 weeks
Vitals - Respirations
Respirations represents breaths per minute
Time frame: 0 weeks and 16 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.