The investigators hypothesized that: 1\) an intervention targeted at the prescribing physician would increase the rate of a metoclopramide discontinuation among patients prescribed the medication for questionable or unclear indications; and 2) the discontinuation would be durable.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
85
Physicians in the intervention group were mailed a written feedback letter regarding their patients who were prescribed questionable metoclopramide therapy. Non-intervention providers received no letter. The letter consisted of the following components: 1. The name and medical record # of the patients involved 2. Information regarding the metoclopramide prescription: dates, dosage, indication recorded, and the duration of therapy 3. A reminder of the adverse effect of long-term metoclopramide therapy 4. A recommendation to consider having the patient undergo a trial of metoclopramide discontinuation if appropriate, and documentation of a discussion of risk and benefits of metoclopramide therapy with patients 5. A request that the physician document the discontinuation trial in the electronic medical record
University of Pennsylvania Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Discontinuation of metoclopramide therapy
Twelve weeks after the intervention period, we searched the medical records of patients in the intervention and non-intervention groups to determine whether discontinuation of metoclopramide therapy had taken place.
Time frame: 12 weeks after intervention period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.