The objective of this study is to determine the product feasibility of the investigational contact lens (Test) when compared to the currently marketed Acuvue Oasys contact lens (Control) and the Air Optix Aqua contact lens (Control) when worn by adapted wearers of soft contact lenses.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
120
After one week of wearing the first lens type, the participants will crossover to the second lens type for one week, and then crossover to the third lens type.
After one week of wearing the first lens type, the participants will crossover to the second lens type for one week, and then crossover to the third lens type.
After one week of wearing the first lens type, the participants will crossover to the second lens type for one week, and then crossover to the third lens type.
Bausch & Lomb
Rochester, New York, United States
Comfort Throughout the Day - Test Lens vs. Air Optix Aqua Lens
Subjective measurements of lens comfort were rated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 was the most favorable.
Time frame: 7 days
Comfort Throughout the Day - Test Lens vs. Acuvue Oasys
Subjective measurements of lens comfort were rated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 was the most favorable.
Time frame: 7 days
Lens Wettability, Test Lens vs. Acuvue Oasys
Lens wettability was assessed at each visit as Grade 4 - 0, with 4=optimal (100% of anterior surface wettable) and 0=severe (Presence of one or more non-wetting areas \> 0.5 mm in size).
Time frame: 7 days
Lens Wettability, Test Lens vs. Air Optix Aqua
Lens wettability was assessed at each visit as Grade 4 - 0, with 4=optimal (100% of anterior surface wettable) and 0=severe (Presence of one or more non-wetting areas \> 0.5 mm in size).
Time frame: 7 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.