The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of SIRT as compared with Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced liver cancer in terms of overall survival (OS). The Study null hypothesis is, there is no difference in overall survival between patients receiving SIRT and those receiving Sorafenib therapy.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 5th most common cancer worldwide but unfortunately between 70 - 80% of all HCC are in the Asia-Pacific because of the prevalence of chronic viral hepatitis in the region. The increase in the prevalence of chronic hepatitis C in the Western world however predicts that HCC will similarly be an important cause of death there in the next 20 years. Only 15-20% of HCC are today potentially curable by surgery at the time of diagnosis. Another 10-15% of patients may benefit from potentially curative locally ablative therapy such as radio-frequency ablation. Prognosis in the majority of patients has been dismal as conventional systemic therapies have been largely inefficacious. The first successfully trialed systemic targeted therapy, sorafenib (2007) prolonged survival by a modest average of 3 months in patients with good underlying liver function. While the liver is radio-sensitive, external beam radiation causes significant radio-toxicity. To overcome this, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) was developed to deliver a radiation source directly to liver cancer via the arterial route. Sir-sphere is radioactive yttrium on a 90 micro-meter diameter resin carrier and is an established therapy in colorectal metastasis. Sir-sphere has been reported to cause significantly tumour regression in HCC. This study will evaluate the efficacy of SIRT using SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 microspheres compared to sorafenib in the treatment of patients with locally advanced primary HCC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
360
One time treatment. Dose administered based on tumour volume. Each vial is 3.0GBq.
Oral Tablet, 400mg B.i.d, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops
Overall Survival
Overall Survival is defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death due to any cause. All patients will be followed up until death to compare the overall survival between the two treatments. 2 years is an estimated time frame.
Time frame: 2 years
Progression free survival in the liver
Progression-free survival in the liver is defined as the time interval between randomisation and the date of tumour progression in the liver or death, whichever is earlier. Tumour progression in the liver will be determined from serial CT scans. Diagnosis of tumour progression of disease should be made using the RECIST guideline version 1.1. 2 years is an estimated time frame.
Time frame: 2 years
Progression free survival overall
Progression-free survival overall is defined as the time interval between randomisation and the date of tumour progression at any site in the body or death, whichever is earlier. Tumour progression at any site in the body will be measured by any definitive imaging technique including CT scan, MRI study or other nuclear medicine scan. The Investigator should clearly indicate the site of tumour progression (hepatic or extra-hepatic) at the time of recurrence. 2 years is an estimated time frame.
Time frame: 2 years
Tumour Response Rate
Tumour response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the new response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) \[European Journal of Cancer (45): 228 - 247, 2009\] (http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/docs/recist\_guideline.pdf). 2 years is an estimated time frame
Time frame: 2 years
Toxicity and Safety
Toxicity will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 4.02. Patients for both treatment arms will be followed-up for safety and toxicity from the time of study entry (randomisation day) until 30 days post study conclusion or until commencement of the next alternative therapy, which ever is earlier.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The Brunei Cancer Centre
Kampong Jerudong, Brunei, Brunei
Yangon GI & Liver Centre
Yangon, Burma
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
University of Udayana, Rumah Sakit Sanglah, Indonesia
Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital ,University of Indonesia
Jakarta, Indonesia
Penang Adventist Hospital
George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Sarawak General Hospital
Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
University Malaya Medical Center
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
National Cancer Center of Mongolia
Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Auckland City Hospital
Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand
...and 19 more locations
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Health Related Quality of Life (QoL)
Quality of life (QoL) will be measured by using the EQ-5D questionnaire over the study period. QoL for patients will be measured until their first disease progression up to 2 years (estimated) which ever is earlier.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Liver resection rate
Patients will be assessed for suitability for liver resection every 12 weekly until their study conclusion up to 2 years which ever is earlier.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Liver Transplantation Rate
Patients will be assessed for suitability for liver transplantation every 12 weekly until their study conclusion up to 2 years which ever is earlier.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Time to Disease Progression
Time to Disease Progression (TTP) is defined as a measure of time after a disease is diagnosed (or treated) until the disease starts to get worse. Disease Progression will be measured by RECIST guideline version 1.1. TTP will be measured every 12 weekly up to 2 years (estimated).
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Disease control rate
Time frame: 2 years