The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in participants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) therapy, previously treated with intravenous (IV) epoetin alfa.
Dose ranging study with consecutive cohorts in two participant populations: participants normally responding to current anemia treatment (epoetin alfa) ("normoresponders": participants with baseline epoetin alfa dose at study entry 75 to 450 international units \[IU\]/kilograms \[kg\]/week) and participants not responding well to current treatment ("hyporesponders": participants with maintenance epoetin alfa dose above 450 IU/kg/week). Normoresponders are randomized to study drug roxadustat or epoetin alfa at a ratio of 3:1; hyporesponders are randomized to study drug roxadustat or epoetin alfa or placebo at a ratio of 2:1:1. The study objectives are to demonstrate that roxadustat is effective in maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) levels when converting from epoetin alfa and to establish optimum starting doses and dose adjustment regimens for Hb maintenance.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
161
Roxadustat will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arms.
Epoetin Alfa will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arms.
Placebo matching to roxadustat will be administered per schedule specified in the arm.
Unnamed facility
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Pine Bluff, Arkansas, United States
Number of Participants With Week 7 Hb ≥ Baseline Hb - 0.5 g/dL, Among Normoresponder Participants Treated for 6 Weeks Only
Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 3 Hb values obtained prior to the first dose of study treatment, including Day 1 predose. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing values.
Time frame: Week 7
Number of Participants With Week 7 Hb ≥ Baseline Hb - 0.5 g/dL, Among Hyporesponsive Participants Treated for at Least 6 Weeks
Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 3 Hb values obtained prior to the first dose of study treatment, including Day 1 predose. LOCF method was used to impute missing values.
Time frame: Week 7
Number of Participants With a Mean Hb Above 11 g/dL When the Mean Hb Values at Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20 Were Averaged, Among Participants Treated for 19 Weeks
The average of the mean Hb values that were above 11 g/dL at Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20 are presented. LOCF method was used to impute missing values.
Time frame: Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20
Number of Participants With a Mean of Hb Within 11-13 g/dL (Values Obtained at Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20 for Participants Dosed for 19 Weeks)
The average of the mean Hb values that were within 11-13 g/dL at Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20 are presented. LOCF method was used to impute missing values.
Time frame: Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20
Number of Participants With a Mean of Hb Within 10-13 g/dL (Values Obtained at Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20 for Participants Dosed for 19 Weeks)
The average of the mean Hb values that were within 10-13 g/dL at Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20 are presented. Because of the small number of hyporesponders enrolled into this study, data for this secondary efficacy analysis as planned per protocol was not collected and summarized for hyporesponder participants. LOCF method was used to impute missing values.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Azusa, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Northridge, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Ontario, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Paramount, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Yuba City, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
...and 15 more locations
Time frame: Weeks 17, 18, 19, and 20
Change From Baseline in Hb at Week 7 for Participants Treated for at Least 6 Weeks
Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 3 Hb values obtained prior to the first dose of study treatment, including Day 1 predose. LOCF method was used to impute missing values.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 7
Change From Baseline in Hb at Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, and 20 for Participants Treated for 7-19 Weeks
Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 3 Hb values obtained prior to the first dose of study treatment, including Day 1 predose. LOCF method was used to impute missing values.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, and 20
Number of Participants Who Required Dose Adjustments During the Dosing Period for Participants Treated for 6 Weeks Only
Number of participants who required dose increase, dose reduce, dose interruption or dose resume were reported. Because of the small number of hyporesponders enrolled into this study, data for this secondary efficacy analysis as planned per protocol was not collected and summarized for hyporesponder participants.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 6
Number of Participants Who Required Dose Adjustments During the Dosing Period for Participants Treated for 19 Weeks
Number of participants who required dose increase, dose reduce, dose interruption or dose resume were reported. Because of the small number of hyporesponders enrolled into this study, data for this secondary efficacy analysis as planned per protocol was not collected and summarized for hyporesponder participants.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 19
Number of Participants Whose Hb Levels Were Maintained at Week 7 to Within ±1 g/dL of Their Mean 4-Week Screening Period Baseline Value for Participants Treated for At Least 6 Weeks
Time frame: Week 7
Number of Participants Whose Hb Levels Were Maintained at Week 7 to Within ±1 g/dL of Their Mean 4-Week Screening Period Baseline Value for Participants Treated for 19 Weeks
Time frame: Week 7
Number of Participants Treated for 6 Weeks Only Whose Hb Levels at Week 7 Were Greater Than Their Baseline Level
Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 3 Hb values obtained prior to the first dose of study treatment, including Day 1 predose. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Because of the small number of hyporesponders enrolled into this study, data for this secondary efficacy analysis as planned per protocol was not collected and summarized for hyporesponder participants.
Time frame: Week 7
Number of Participants Treated for 7-19 Weeks Whose Hb Levels at Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, and 20 Were Greater Than Their Baseline Level
Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 3 Hb values obtained prior to the first dose of study treatment, including Day 1 predose. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Because of the small number of hyporesponders enrolled into this study, data for this secondary efficacy analysis as planned per protocol was not collected and summarized for hyporesponder participants.
Time frame: Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, and 20
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue Anemia Treatment Due to Hb Levels, Among Participants Treated for at Least 6 Weeks
Rescue anemia treatment included any ESA dosing, RBC transfusion, or IV iron.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 6
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue Anemia Treatment Due to Hb Levels, Among Participants Treated for 19-Weeks
Rescue anemia treatment included any ESA dosing, RBC transfusion, or IV iron.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 19
Number of Participants Requiring Dose Reduction Secondary to Excessive Erythropoiesis During Dosing Period, Among Participants Treated for at Least 6-Weeks
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 6
Number of Participants Requiring Dose Reduction Secondary to Excessive Erythropoiesis During Dosing Period, Among Participants Treated for 19-Weeks
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 19
Rate of Change in Hb Levels, Measured by Regression Slopes of the Hb Values During Treatment up to Week 6
The rate of rise was computed as the slope of the regression line of change in Hb level (in g/dL) vs. time (in weeks) using Random Coefficient Model. Because of the small number of hyporesponders enrolled into this study, data for this secondary efficacy analysis as planned per protocol was not collected and summarized for hyporesponder participants.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 6
Trough Plasma Concentration of Roxadustat and Epoetin Alfa
Time frame: Predose, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postdose at Weeks 1 and 6