This trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") with placebo on the efficacy and safety of treatment in poststroke subjects with focal wrist, finger and in some cases, thumb spasticity. Approximately 168 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will receive a single treatment session of intramuscular GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") '200U or 240U (if thumb spasticity is present)' or placebo in a randomization ratio of 1:1. The subjects will be observed until 12 weeks post injection. Outcome measures include changes from baseline at every post injection visit as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) and Global Assessment Scale. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline at week 6 for wrist flexor muscle tone as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale. Safety parameters will also be measured including adverse events, vital signs (pulse and blood pressure) and clinical laboratory tests (haematology, serum chemistry and urinanalysis).
The primary objective of this study is to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment session with GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, aslo known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") '200U or 240U (if thumb spasticity is present)' over placebo in subjects with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both wrist and fingers flexors as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). This trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study comparing GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") to placebo for the treatment of subjects with focal wrist, finger and in some cases, thumb spasticity post-stroke. Approximately 168 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will receive a single treatment session with intramuscular injections of GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") '200U or 240U (if thumb spasticity is present)' or placebo in a randomization ration of 1:1. The subjects will be observed until 12 weeks post injection. Each completed subject will attend 7 clinic visits. The maximum study duration is 13 weeks per subject. The study includes a 1 week pretreatment period, during which the screening visit (visit 1) is to take place. Only one upper limb (meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria) will be evaluated and treated in the study. Subjects will receive a single intramuscular treatment with either investigated drug or placebo at day 0 (visit 2). There will be five post-injection follow-up visits at weeks 1, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (visits 3 to 7). Week 6 (visit 5) is designated as the primary visit for determining efficacy. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline at week 6 for wrist flexor muscle tone as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). The secondary endpoints include The secondary endpoints include the area under curve (AUC) for the MAS wrist score change from baseline, change from baseline for wrist/finger/thumb flexor muscle tone as measured on MAS, Disability Assessment Scale and Global Assessment Scale. The safety measures include adverse events, clinical laboratory tests and pulse, blood pressure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
170
GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox")
placebo
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
GSK Investigational Site
Haerbin, Heilongjiang, China
GSK Investigational Site
Wuhan, Hubei, China
GSK Investigational Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
GSK Investigational Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
GSK Investigational Site
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
GSK Investigational Site
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
GSK Investigational Site
Beijing, China
GSK Investigational Site
Beijing, China
GSK Investigational Site
Beijing, China
...and 3 more locations
Change From Baseline at Week 6 for Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's wrist as quickly as possible to grade flexor muscle tone. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at Week 6 was calculated as the value at Week 6 minus the value at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 6
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline at Weeks 6 and 12 for MAS Wrist Score
The MAS wrist score was assessed by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension). Mean change from Baseline for the MAS wrist score was calculated as the value at Week 6 and Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. In a graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis (HA) and changes from Baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the HA was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 6, and Week 12
Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 for Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS
The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's wrist as quickly as possible to grade flexor muscle tone. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12
Number of Participants Classified as Wrist Treatment Responders at All Post-injection Visits
Wrist treatment responders were defined as participants with a decrease in wrist flexor muscle tone of at least one point on the MAS. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension).
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 for Finger Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS
The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's finger as quickly as possible to grade the flexor muscle tone. The MAS finger score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Week 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8 and 12 for Thumb Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS
The investigator, physotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's thumb as quickly as possible to grade the flexor muscle tone. The MAS thumb score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Week 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 for Principal Measure as Assessed on the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS)
The investigator assessed 4 areas of disability, hygiene, pain, dressing, and limb posture, using the 4-point DAS (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first dose, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected 1functional disability item (which had to have a score of 2 or greater as measured on the DAS, indicating moderate to severe disability) from the 4 areas of disability and assessed it as a principal measure. Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
Global Assessment Scale (GAS) Score as Evaluated by the Physician at the Indicated Time Points
The physician used the GAS to assess response to treatment at each visit after injection. The assessor was the same throughout the study period. GAS scores were assessed by using the 9-point GAS (-4, -3, -2, -1, -0, +1, +2, +3, +4; -4=very marked worsenig, -0=unchanged, +4=very marked improvement) at the indicated time points.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
GAS Score as Evaluated by the Care Giver or the Participants at the Indicated Time Points
The care giver or participants used the GAS to assess response to treatment at each visit after injection. The assessor was the same throughout the study period. GAS scores were assessed by using the 9-point GAS (-4, -3, -2, -1, -0, +1, +2, +3, +4; -4=very marked worsening, -0=unchanged, +4=very marked improvement) at the indicated time point.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.