Quadriceps-sparing minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with side-cutting instruments has been proposed to limit surgical dissection without compromising the surgical outcome. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to compare the outcomes of quadriceps-sparing TKA with conventional medial parapatellar TKA, with two-year follow-up. We hypothesize that the quadriceps-sparing arthrotomy would not outperform the conventional medial parapatellar arthrotomy in TKA, in terms of postoperative recovery of quadriceps muscle strength, alignment of the prosthetic knee, and clinical outcome.
Eighty primary TKAs in sixty patients of osteoarthritis constituted this study. Patients were randomly assigned to either quadriceps-sparing (QS, 40 knees) or medial parapatellar (MP, 40 knees) group. All surgeries were designed to set the prosthesis with thefemoral component alignment of 7º valgus and the tibial component alignment perpendicular to tibial shaft. Outcome variables included knee function defined by Hospital for Special Surgery knee score, quadriceps muscle strength measured by isokinetic dynamometer, pain indicated on visual analogue scale, range of motion, and post-operative alignment measured on plain radiograph.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Quadriceps-sparing arthrotomy with side-cutting instruments
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
To compare the clinic and functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) respectively through a quadriceps-sparing (QS) approach and a MIS medial parapatellar (MP) approach
Perioperative parameters: operative time, blood loss, Doses of narcotics for pain control, peri-operative complications Postoperative parameters: VAS, range of motion, knee functional score, isokinetic studies, radiographic alignment, complications
Time frame: 2 years
To compare the survival and functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) respectively through a quadriceps-sparing (QS) approach and a MIS medial parapatellar (MP) approach at 2-year follow-up.
Postoperative parameters: VAS, range of motion, knee functional score, isokinetic studies, radiographic alignment and failure rate of knee prothesis
Time frame: 5 and 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.