Background: There are worrying signs from Western Cambodia that parasitological responses to artesunate containing treatment regimens for uncomplicated falciparum malaria are slower than elsewhere in the world. Delayed parasite clearance and unusually high failure rates with artesunate-mefloquine have been reported. These antimalarials are central to current treatment strategies and spread of significant resistance outside this area would be a global disaster. Radical containment measures are needed. In this context there is an urgent need to proceed quickly to investigate whether there is any evidence of resistance to artemisinin derivatives in Vietnam. Objective: The primary objective is to assess the slope of the decline in the log parasitemia-time curve in patients treated with artesunate 2mg/kg/day, artesunate 4mg/kg/day or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine once daily, and to compare the results of this study to the pharmacokinetic results and to the recent data from patients in Cambodia and Thailand treated with equivalent therapies. Methods: The trial will be conducted in Phuoc Long Hospital, Binh Phuoc Province, Vietnam. The participants will be febrile patients (aged \> 10 years) with slide confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum infection. Patients will be treated with either artesunate 2mg/kg/day, artesunate 4mg/kg/day or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine once daily for 3 days. Patients on artesunate therapy arms will then receive 3 days of treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine with dosages according to the national guidelines. Clinical and parasitological parameters will be monitored over a 42-day follow-up period. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin will be assessed by using a population pharmacokinetic modeling.
This surveillance study is a three-arm prospective evaluation of the efficacy of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. This will be an evaluation of the slope of the decline in the log parasitemia-time curve, parasite clearance times in patients randomized to one of two different doses of oral artesunate or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. People with uncomplicated malaria who meet the study inclusion criteria will be enrolled, screened, randomized and treated on site with either artesunate 2mg/kg/day, artesunate 4mg/kg/day or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine once daily according to weight for 3 days. The artesunate arms will immediately follow with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine therapy for 3 days (study days 3 - 6) at the dose defined by national guidelines. Patients on all three arms will be monitored for 42 days. The follow-up will consist of a fixed schedule of check-up visits and corresponding clinical and laboratory examinations. PCR analysis will be used to distinguish between true recrudescence due to treatment failure and reinfection.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
166
artesunate 2mg/kg/day, artesunate 4mg/kg/day or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine once daily
Phuoc Long Hospital
Dong Xoai, Binh Phuoc, Vietnam
Slope of the decline in the log parasitemia-time curve relative to historical data
Time frame: 03 days
Clearance rate assessed from the fitted slope of the log-linear parasite curves
Time frame: 72 hours
Proportion of patients who have a parasite clearance time >72 hours after initiation of each treatment
Time frame: 72 hours
Parasitological efficacy of the three treatment arms
Time frame: Over 72 hours and during follow-up treatment over a total follow-up period of 42 days
Relative proportion of patients treated with artesunate 2mg/kg/day versus artesunate 4mg/kg/day versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine once daily
Patients who result as early treatment failures, late clinical failures, late parasitological failures or adequate clinical and parasitological response as indicators of efficacy
Time frame: 03 days
Recrudescence and new infection rate defined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis between treatment arms
Time frame: 42 days
Number of adverse events in each treatment arm
Time frame: After initiation and during follow-up treatment over a total follow-up period of 42 days.
Assess the pharmacokinetic characteristics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine by using population pharmacokinetic modeling
Time frame: 03 days and upon relapse
Characterize different genetic patterns from different resistant strains
Time frame: 03 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.