The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the HeartWare Ventricular Assist System in patients with chronic Stage D/ New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IIIB/IV left ventricular failure who have received and failed optimal medical therapy, and who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation.
The HeartWare Ventricular Assist System (VAS) is intended for use in patients with chronic Stage D/NYHA Class IIIB/IV left ventricular failure who have received and failed optimal medical therapy and who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation. The ENDURANCE clinical study is a prospective, randomized, unblinded, multi-center, non-inferiority evaluation of the HeartWare® VAS versus a control group consisting of any FDA-approved Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) approved for destination therapy. Patients are randomized to HeartWare® VAS or control LVAD in a 2:1 ratio. Each patient receiving the HeartWare® VAS or control LVAD is followed to the primary endpoint at 2 years, with a subsequent follow-up period extending to 5 years post implant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
451
The HeartWare® VAS is an implantable centrifugal pump that was designed to provide flows up to 10 L/min in a small device that is both lightweight and simple to use.
Any FDA-approved LVAD for destination therapy.
Stroke-Free Survival Probability for 2 Years Post Implant
The primary endpoint of the trial is stroke-free survival at two years, defined as alive on the originally implanted device, electively transplanted or explanted due to patient recovery and free from disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Scale \>=4). The Modified Rankin Scale is scored from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates an absence of symptoms and 6 indicates death. A score of 4 or higher indicates moderately severe or greater disability. Weibull model estimates of survival probability (shown as a percent of 100) are used.
Time frame: Implant to 2 years
Number of Participants With Bleeding
Number of participants with bleeding, per Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) definition. The event of bleeding is defined as: An episode of suspected internal or external bleeding that results in one or more of the following: 1. Death, 2. Re-operation, 3. Hospitalization, 4. Transfusion of red blood cells as follows: During first 7 days post implant * Adults (≥ 50 kg): ≥ 4U packed red blood cells (PRBC) within any 24 hour period during first 7 days post implant. After 7 days post implant * Any transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) after 7 days following implant.
Time frame: Implant to two years
Number of Participants With Major Infections
Number of participants with major infections, per INTERMACS definition. A major infection is defined as: A clinical infection accompanied by pain, fever, drainage and/or leukocytosis that is treated by anti-microbial agents (non-prophylactic). A positive culture from the infected site or organ should be present unless strong clinical evidence indicates the need for treatment despite negative cultures. The general categories of infection include Localized non-device infection Percutaneous site and/or pocket infection Internal pump component, inflow or outflow tract infection Sepsis
Time frame: Implant to two years
Overall Survival at 2 Years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Mayo Clinic Hospital - Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
The University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
Sharp Memorial
San Diego, California, United States
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
University of Colorado Hospital - Leprino
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of Florida - Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, United States
University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital
Miami, Florida, United States
Tampa Transplant Institute/Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
...and 38 more locations
Overall survival is the probability (expressed as a percent of 100) did not died within 2 years post implant via the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants that did not died were censored at the time of last follow-up or 2 years post implant, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: Implant to two years
Number of Participants With Device Malfunctions
Number of Participants with device malfunctions per INTERMACS definition. Device malfunction denotes a failure of one or more of the components of the Mechanical Circulatory Support Device (MCSD) system which either directly causes or could potentially induce a state of inadequate circulatory support (low cardiac output state) or death. The manufacturer must confirm device failure. A failure that was iatrogenic or recipient-induced will be classified as an Iatrogenic/Recipient-Induced Failure. Device failure should be classified according to which components fails as follows: 1. Pump failure (blood contacting components of pump and any motor or other pump actuating mechanism that is housed with the blood contacting components). 2. Non-pump failure (e.g., external pneumatic drive unit, electric power supply unit, batteries, controller, interconnect cable, compliance chamber)
Time frame: Implant to two years
Health Status Change Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Health Status change as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score. The KCCQ is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (e.g., better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life). The Overall Summary Score is calculated as the mean of the Physical Limitation, Total Symptom, Quality of Life and Social Limitation scores. A positive change in score from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 2 years
Health Status Change Measured by EuroQol EQ-5D (Version 3L)
The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). An adjustment was done on the response where the scores were normalized based on this paper: Johnson JA, Coons SJ. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample. Qual Life Res. 1998 Feb;7(2):155-66.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 2 years
Change in Functional Status Measured by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Change in Functional status, as measured by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. There are 4 levels of NYHA: I (Mild): No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. II (Mild): Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. III (Moderate): Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. IV (Severe): Unable to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased. Improvement is defined as moving from a higher numerical NYHA level to a lower numerical NYHA level (e.g., IV to III).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 2 years
Change in Functional Status as Measured by 6-minute Walk
Change in functional status, as measured by 6-minute walk test.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 2 years
Length of Initial Hospitalization
Length of Initial Hospitalization post implant
Time frame: Implant to the end of the initial hospitalization
Number of Participants Who Had a Re-hospitalization
Number of participants who had a re-hospitalization while on the device
Time frame: Implant to two years
Duration of Re-hospitalization
Duration of Re-hospitalization while on device
Time frame: Implant to two years
Cause of Re-hospitalization
Cause of Re-hospitalization while on device. The reason a participant may have been re-hospitalized was due to an adverse event, the need for an explant, or for various "Other" reasons.
Time frame: Implant to two years