The purpose of this pivotal Phase 1/3 study is to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, the hemostatic efficacy, and the safety of BAX 326, a recombinant factor IX, in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
86
* Study Part 1: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Crossover with BAX326 and BeneFIX * Study Part 2: Open-label evaluation of prophylaxis and on-demand BAX326 only * Study Part 3: Open-label repeat of PK evaluation (repeat Study Part 1) with BAX326 only and same study participants as Study Part 1
* Study Part 1: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Crossover with BAX326 and BeneFIX. * BeneFIX only used in Part 1 of this study. * Study Part 2 and 3 only utilized BAX326
Unnamed facility
Rosario, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Brasília, Brazil
Unnamed facility
São Paulo, Brazil
Study Part 1- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From 0 to 72 Hours Per Dose
Computed using the linear trapezoidal method. The concentration at 72 hours was interpolated from the two nearest sampling time points or extrapolated using the last quantifiable concentration and the terminal rate constant λz. λz was estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R\^2.
Time frame: 72 hours
Study Parts 1 and 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration/Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity Per Dose (AUC0-∞/ Dose)
Defined as (AUC0-t + Ct)/ λz/ dose, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. λz will be estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R\^2. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion
Study Parts 1 and 3: Mean Residence Time (MRT)
Computed as Area under the moment curve 0-∞ (AUMC0-∞) / AUC0-∞- TI/2, where AUMC0-∞ will be determined in a similar manner as AUC0-∞ and TI represents infusion duration \[hr\] The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion
Study Parts 1 and 3: Clearance (CL)
Computed as Dose/ AUC0-∞. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unnamed facility
Santiago, Chile
Unnamed facility
Bogotá, Colombia
Unnamed facility
Cali, Colombia
Unnamed facility
Prague, Czechia
Unnamed facility
Hiroshima, Japan
Unnamed facility
Nara, Japan
...and 15 more locations
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion
Study Parts 1 and 3: Incremental Recovery at Cmax (IR at Cmax)
Defined as (Cmax - Cpre-infusion)/Dose, where maximum concentration (Cmax) will be determined as the highest concentration achieved within one hour after infusion. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 1 hour post-infusion
Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time
IR at 30 Minutes was measured at the following time points during the study: - Part 1 or Part 2, Exposure Day (ED) 1. (If participant was present for Study Part 1, then ED 1 from Part 1 was used. If Participant entered study in Study Part 2, then ED 1 from Part 2 was used.) - Part 2: Week 5 - Part 2: Week 13 - Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26 (Week 26 of study participation) - Study Completion or Termination Visit
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion and 30 minutes post-infusion
Change in Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time
The median changes in IR at 30 Minutes, calculated as the change in IR value from exposure day 1 (ED1).
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion and 30 minutes post-infusion
Study Parts 1 and 3: Half Life (T 1/2)
Elimination phase half-life will be determined as ln2/ λz. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion
Study Parts 1 and 3: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
Vss computed as CL·MRT. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion
Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326
ABR during prophylaxis (twice-weekly) in Part 2 was calculated as (Number of bleeding episodes/observed treatment period in days) \* 365.25. The treatment period on prophylaxis was defined as time between the first and the last prophylactic infusions and ABR on prophylaxis was calculated for participants who received a minimum of 3 months of prophylactic treatment with BAX326.
Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)
Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause
The number of bleeding episodes treated with 1, 2, or ≥3 infusions of BAX326 to achieve adequate hemostasis. Only infusions required until resolution of bleed were considered.
Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Study Part 2 began at week 3-5)
Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause
Rating Scale for Treatment of BEs (4-point ordinal scale): -Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding (eg, swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal hemorrhage) after a single infusion. No additional infusion required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusions to maintain hemostasis did not affect this scoring. -Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. -Fair: Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after single infusion. Required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. -None: No improvement or condition worsens.
Time frame: At bleed resolution throughout the study period of 22 months (Study Parts 1, 2, and 3)
Total Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause
Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)
Consumption of BAX326 Per Event Per Participant
Weight-adjusted consumption of BAX326 by event per participant, i.e., for prophylactic treatment and for treatment of bleeds until resolution of bleed.
Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)
Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Number of Infusions Per Month
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Prophylaxis and On-Demand period), Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Weight-adjusted Consumption Per Month
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Prophylaxis and On-Demand period), Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants Who Developed Inhibitory Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Occurrence of Total Binding Antibodies of Indeterminate Specificity (Within Assay Variability)
Occurrence of total binding antibodies of indeterminate specificity (within assay variability) to FIX, antibodies to CHO proteins and rFurin is defined by a dilution of 2 or less increase as compared to levels at screening visit (e.g. negative to 1:20 or 1:40).
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Occurrence of Treatment Related Total Binding Antibodies
Occurrence of treatment related total binding antibodies to Factor IX (FIX), antibodies to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) proteins, and recombinant furin (rFurin) is defined by more than 2-dilution increase as compared to levels at screening visit and confirmed specificity (e.g. negative to 1:80)
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Severe Allergic Reactions (e.g. Anaphylaxis)
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Thrombotic Events
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Clinical Chemistry
Clinically significant changes in chemistry assessments for Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bicarbonate, Bilirubin, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Protein (Serum), Sodium. Clinically Significant (CS) defined as: -1. The abnormal value constitutes an adverse event (AE) and, -2. The abnormal value is a symptom of or related to a disease that is already recorded as an AE in Case Report Form (CRF).
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Hematology
Clinically significant changes in hematology assessments for Basophils, Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume, Erythrocytes, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils/Leukocytes, Platelets,
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Vital Signs
Clinically significant changes in vital signs assessments for pulse rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, body temperature
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Thrombogenic Markers
Clinically significant changes in thrombogenic markers assessments for thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), prothrombin fragment 1.2, and D-dimer as evaluated by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 Treatment
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, and Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 Treatment
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, and Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores
EQ-5D is a participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D total score ranges from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores
Participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
General Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Participant rated assessment of health-related quality of life. The VAS Pain Scale rates current health state on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)
The PCS is a summary scale of the dimensions physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health. The component score is normalized to a standard population. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL Mental Health
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL Vitality
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
SF-36: HRQoL General Health
Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)
The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, \& school functioning) are scored.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)
The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, \& school functioning) are scored.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)
The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, \& school functioning) are scored.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL
The Haem-A-QOL instrument has been developed and used in hemophilia A patients. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and outlook for the future. For the Haem-A-QOL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haemo-QoL - Participants On-Demand (Ages 12-16)
The Haemo-QoL is a quality of life (QoL) assessment instrument for children and adolescents with haemophilia. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. For the Haemo-QoL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.
Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)
Health Resource Use - Number of Hospitalizations
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Total Days of Hospital Stay
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Emergency Room Visits
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office Visits
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or School
Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)