Asthma is the most common chronic illness of childhood, and hospitalization rates are increasing. In the US, impoverished children and children from minority ethnic and racial backgrounds suffer disproportionately from asthma. While National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines recommend daily preventive medications for all children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma, studies indicate that many children in the US who should receive preventive medications are not receiving them. The overall goal of this project is to target an ethnically diverse population of inner-city schoolchildren with asthma and explore a school-based program to reduce asthma morbidity. We hypothesize that children receiving a comprehensive school-based intervention will experience less asthma-related morbidity compared to children receiving usual care. Our comprehensive school-based intervention consists of both administration of recommended preventive asthma medications in school (with dose adjustments according to NHLBI guidelines) and an environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) reduction program in the home for smoke-exposed children. Our secondary hypothesis is that, among the subgroup of smoke-exposed children, those who receive the school-based intervention with ETS reduction will experience less asthma morbidity than those who receive usual care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
530
The intervention includes directly observed administration of preventive medications in school and a home-based ETS reduction program (for those living with one or more smokers).
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Number of Symptom Free Days
The primary outcome variable is the average number of symptom free days over 2 weeks assessed during peak asthma season (data collected during November, December, January and February during the school year).
Time frame: Average Symptom Free Days, over 2 weeks, during peak asthma season (November-February)
Cotinine Level
To test the effectiveness of the environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) reduction portion of the study, we will compare baseline cotinine values to 2 month (for smoke exposed participants) and final follow-up assessments (for all participants).
Time frame: 2 month and approximately 9 month (end of school year) follow-up assessments
Cost Effectiveness of the Intervention
Cost-effectiveness will examine the net program costs to the number of symptom-free days gained. Benefits will be described as the net difference in medical and productivity costs between children in the treatment and control groups.
Time frame: approximately 9 months (length of school year)
Additional Asthma Morbidity Outcomes
We will look at additional asthma morbidity outcomes including symptom nights, days needing rescue medications, functional severity, days absent from school, and quality of life.
Time frame: 1-9 months (Monthly Follow-up assessments)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.