Dietary fiber consumption may contribute to weight regulation by improving satiety. In an earlier study the investigators found that a muffin containing resistant starch was more effective than other fibers in altering satiety. The objective of this study is to determine if 2 resistant starches consumed in muffins alter satiety and whether a mixture of resistant starches is more effective than either alone in enhancing satiety.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
20
Dextrin control administered in a muffin treatment.
9g Hi-maize resistant starch administered in a muffin treatment.
9g Novalose 330 resistant starch administered in a muffin treatment.
University of Minnesota
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Satiety response using visual analogue scales
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 0 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 15 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 30 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 45 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 60 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 90 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
4.5g Hi-maize and 4.5g Novalose 330 in a muffin treatment.
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 120 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 180 minutes postprandially
Satiety response using VAS
Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Time frame: 240 minutes postprandially
Ad libitum food intake
Time frame: 240 minutes postprandially and over 24 hours
Breath hydrogen response
Time frame: 0, 240 minutes
Gastrointestinal tolerance using visual analogue scales (VAS)
Subjective ratings of bloating, stool consistency, and flatulence on VAS. A stool count was also recorded.
Time frame: 24 hours