The purpose of this study is to evaluate a validated diagnostic prediction model in the appropriate diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure (AHF) in patients presenting at the emergency department with undifferentiated dyspnea.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
186
Patients randomized to the arm where the clinician is exposed to the model results should be treated as per the model probability (i.e. if the model probability suggests AHF the clinician should treat for AHF).
Patients randomized to the arm where the clinician is blinded to the model results will undergo diagnostic tests and receive treatment as per the clinician's judgment and usual care standards.
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, United States
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Waikato Hospital Cardiology Clinical Trials Unit
Waikato, New Zealand
Comparison of diagnostic model versus clinical judgment in appropriate diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure in dyspneic emergency department patients
Time frame: 60 days after patient presentation to the emergency department
Determine if use of the diagnostic prediction model leads to cost savings and better health outcomes
Time frame: From randomization until 60 days after patient presentation to the emergency department
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.