The purpose of this study was to document the reasons for replacement or repair of defective restorations ("fillings") and to record the restorative material of the failed restoration and the material used in the replacement restoration on permanent ("adult") teeth.
The aims of this study were to (1) quantify the prevalence of reason(s) for replacing existing restorations in DPBRN practices; (2) quantify the percentages and types of restorative materials of failed restorations that are being replaced in DPBRN practices; (3) quantify the percentages and types of restorative materials used to replace or repair failed restorations in DPBRN practices; and (4) test the hypothesis that DPBRN practitioner-investigators who reported in a previous study that they treat enamel lesions operatively are more likely in actual patients as in this study to replace entire restorations rather than do repairs and are more likely to report the clinical diagnosis of secondary caries as a reason for replacement.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
6,368
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Florida College of Dentistry
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Health Partners Dental Group
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Health Partners Research Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Portland, Oregon, United States
Permanente Denrtal Associates
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Copenhagen Royal Dental College
Copenhagen, Denmark