A Study in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Phase 3TerminatedNCT01202773

Eli Lilly and Company456 enrolled

Overview

The primary purpose of this study is to help answer if LY2127399 is safe and effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in participants with an inadequate response to one or more tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. This study is comprised of 2 periods: Period 1: 24-week blinded treatment Period 2: 48-week post-treatment follow-up

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

456

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Interventions

LY2127399DRUG

Administered Subcutaneously (SC)

Placebo Q4WDRUG

Administered SC

Placebo Q2WDRUG

Administered SC

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of RA of more than 6 months and less than 15 years * At least 8 tender and swollen joints * An abnormally high C-reactive protein (CRP) level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) * Positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody * Previously treated with biologic TNF-α inhibitor therapy (infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab, etanercept, adalimumab) and stopped treatment due to insufficient efficacy or intolerance * Regular use of at least 1 conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), with a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to study start * Woman must not be pregnant, breastfeeding, or become pregnant during the study Exclusion Criteria: * Use of unstable doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in the past 6 weeks * Steroid injection or intravenous (IV) infusion in the last 6 weeks * Use of more than 10 milligrams/day (mg/day) of oral steroids in the last 6 weeks * History of a serious reaction to other biological DMARDs * Use of an oral calcineurin inhibitor (for example, cyclosporin or tacrolimus) in the last 8 weeks * Surgery on a joint or other major surgery less than 2 months ago, or plans to have joint surgery or major surgery during the study * Active fibromyalgia, juvenile chronic arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriatic arthritis, or other systemic inflammatory condition except RA * Cervical cancer or squamous skin cancer within the past 3 years, or other cancer within the past 5 years * Received a live vaccine received within the past 12 weeks (for example, vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and chicken pox, and nasal-spray flu vaccines) * Hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * A serious bacterial infection (for example, pneumonia or cellulitis) within 3 months or a serious bone or joint infection within 6 months * Symptoms of herpes zoster or herpes simplex within the last month * Active or latent tuberculosis (TB) * Current symptoms of a serious disorder or illness * Use of an investigational drug within the last month

Locations (201)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ACR20 Responder: a ≥20% improvement from baseline in both 68 tender joint counts (TJC) and 66 swollen joint counts (SJC) and a ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's and physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (which measured participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response = (number of ACR20 responders / number of participants treated) \* 100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all participants who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Secondary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) Response

ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of RA. ACR50 Responder: had a ≥50% improvement from baseline in both 68 TJC and 66 SJC and a ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's (Pt's) and physician's global assessment of disease activity, HAQ-DI (measured Pts' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and CRP. Percentage of Pt achieving ACR50 response = \[number (No.) of ACR50 responders / No. of Pts treated\]\*100. ACR70 Responder: had a ≥70% improvement from baseline in both TJC and SJC and a ≥70% improvement in at least 3 of same 5 criteria for ACR50. Percentage of Pts achieving ACR70 response = (No. of ACR70 responders / No. of Pts treated)\*100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all Pts who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

American College of Rheumatology Percent Improvement (ACR-N)

ACR-N is a continuous measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional outcomes in RA that characterizes percentage (%) of improvement in disease activity from baseline based on ACR core set. This index was calculated as minimum of either a) % change in TJC, b) % change in SJC, or c) the median % change of remaining 5 ACR core criteria: If ≥3 components of the 5 ACR core criteria were missing, then c) was set to missing; if any of 3 components a), b), or c) were missing, then ACR-N was set to missing. Percentage of improvement was truncated to range of -100 to 100 to minimize impact of outliers (greater values indicate greater % improvement) and negative scores indicate a decline. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline Disease Activity Score based on 28 joint counts -CRP (DAS28-CRP) as a covariate.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Escondido, California, United States

Fresno, California, United States

Hemet, California, United States

...and 191 more locations

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count)

Tender joint count is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)

Swollen joint count is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Assessment of Pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]

Participant's assessment of their current arthritis pain using VAS ranged from 0 millimeters (mm) (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). A decrease in pain score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)

Participant's assessment of their current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)

Physician's assessment of the participant's current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

The HAQ-DI questionnaire assesses the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty \[0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do)\] when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate HAQ-DI scores, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein Level (DAS28-CRP)

Disease Activity Score (DAS) modified to include 28 joint count (DAS28) consisted of composite score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), CRP (milligrams per liter), and participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (participant global VAS). DAS28-CRP=0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity and remission is DAS28-CRP \<2.6. A decrease in DAS28-CRP indicated an improvement in participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response

EULAR Responder index categorizes clinical response based on improvement since baseline in DAS28-CRP. DAS28-CRP=0.56\*sqrt(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. High disease activity: DAS28-CRP \>5.1, low disease activity: DAS28-CRP \<3.2, and remission: DAS28-CRP \<2.6. Participants are categorized as EULAR responders or NR based on improvement of DAS28-CRP scores from baseline. EULAR DAS28-CRP responder index defines a good (absolute: \<3.2 or \>1.2 improvement from baseline), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2 improvement from baseline), or no response (absolute: \>5.1 or \<0.6 improvement from baseline). Percentage of participants with DAS28-CRP based EULAR response = ( number of participants with specific response) / (number of participants analyzed in the group) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary Scores

SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, 2 component scores (CS), physical CS (PCS) and mental CS (MCS). Domain scores calculated by summing each item for each domain and transforming scores into 0-100 scale; higher scores indicated better health status. If \< 50% of the questions within a domain were answered, the raw score were not calculated. PCS score consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS score consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher score indicating better mental or physical health. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment, region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact Scores

The BFI is a brief participant-reported questionnaire for the rapid assessment of fatigue severity and the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in the past 24 hours. The BFI contains 10 items; however, the first item is not included in the scoring of the scale as it asks about usual fatigue over the past week with the participant answering 'yes' or 'no'. The remaining 9 items assess fatigue severity (3 items) and impact of fatigue on daily functioning (6 items) using an 11-point numeric scale, with 0 = no fatigue and 10 = fatigue as bad as you can imagine. The fatigue impact subscale score is the average of the non-missing responses to 6 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. If more than 3 items within the fatigue impact subscale were not answered by a participant, the subscale is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference Scores

The BPI-SF is a self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the worst pain, least pain, average pain experienced during the past 24 hours and pain based on the pain right now, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Pain interference score is the average of the responses in the past 24 hours to 7 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life \[each item scored from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]. If more than 3 items of the Pain Interference Score are not answered by a participant, the score is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Duration of Morning Stiffness (Minutes)

The Investigator asks participants about the duration of their morning stiffness (in minutes) in and around the joints and records the duration. The Investigator should ask participants about duration of morning stiffness on the day prior to the study visit to capture actual symptoms. If morning stiffness duration is longer than 12 hours (720 minutes), it was truncated to 720 minutes for statistical presentations and analyses.LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Time to ACR20 Response

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Absolute B Cell Counts

Cell-surface marker cluster designation (CD) 3 negative, CD20 positive (CD3-CD20+) defines total mature B cells. B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B cells. Baseline B cell count is the average of the values on or prior to the date of first injection of study treatment, including unscheduled visits. A positive or negative change indicated an increase or decrease, respectively in B cell count. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels

Immunoglobulin (Ig), or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Change from baseline in serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels are reported. A negative change indicated a decrease in Ig levels. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population Pharmacokinetics (PK): Constant Clearance

Population estimate of constant clearance as determined by population PK analysis. A 2-compartment model was used in PK modeling. Constant clearance is the PK parameter which describes the linear elimination of LY2127399 from serum.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-LY2127399 Antibodies

Participants with treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) were participants who had any sample from baseline up to and through Week 52 that was a 4-fold increase (2-dilution increase) in immunogenicity titer over baseline titer, or participants who tested negative at baseline and positive post-baseline (at titer of ≥1:20). Percentage of participants with ADA = (number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA) / (number of participants assessed) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP

CRP is an indicator of inflammation. A negative change indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24