This investigation is designed with the hypothesis that combined PV Antral Isolation and Ablation of Complex Fractionated Electrograms (PVI+CFE) approach will offer a higher success rate compared to the Wide Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation (PVI) approach and to the Combined PV Antral Isolation and Empiric Linear Ablation (PVI+Lines) approach.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
589
Pulmonary vein antrum isolation with additional linear ablation (mitral line and roof line)
Pulmonary vein antrum isolation
Pulmonary vein antrum isolation with additional complex fractionated electrogram ablation
St. Andrews War Memorial Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Southlake Regional Health Centre
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Freedom from AF
Freedom from documented AF episodes \> 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedure with/without antiarrhythmic medications (AAD). In the CT.gov website and in our protocol, we have stated the above primary endpoint (PE). This was the identical PE used in the original STAR AF I study. The intent of this PE was to present the success rates after both 1 procedure and after 2 procedures separately as was done in the original STAR AF I study. However, this is not entirely clear from the way the PE is stated. It may appear that our PE is the success rate after 2 procedures ("1 or 2" may imply "2"). Since our sample size calculation for the STAR AF II study was based on a single procedure success rate, the single procedure success rate with/without AAD will be used as the PE. The success rate after 2 procedures will be provided as the 1st. secondary endpoint. This clarification is done prior to locking the database and prior to any data analysis.
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from atrial arrhythmia
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia episodes \> 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from atrial flutter and AT
Freedom from documented atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia episodes \> 30 seconds at 18 months after one and two procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from documented or not atrial arrhythmia
Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (documented or not) episodes \> 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from symptomatic AF
Freedom from symptomatic AF episodes \> 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmia
Freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmia episodes \> 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Time frame: 18 months
Incidence of peri-procedural complications, including stroke, PV stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury and death
Incidence of peri-procedural complications, including stroke, PV stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury and death
Time frame: 18 months
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
Time frame: 18 months
Number of repeat procedures
Number of repeat procedures
Time frame: 18 months
Effect of each strategy on AF cycle length/regularity/termination
Effect of each strategy on AF cycle length/regularity/termination
Time frame: 18 months
Relationship of acute termination of AF to long-term procedural outcome
Relationship of acute termination of AF to long-term procedural outcome
Time frame: 18 months
Percentage achievement of complete linear block in linear ablation arm
Percentage achievement of complete linear block in linear ablation arm
Time frame: 18 months
Effect of complete linear block on procedural outcome in linear ablation arm
Effect of complete linear block on procedural outcome in linear ablation arm
Time frame: 18 months
Quality of life measurements (SF-36, EQ-5D and CCS SAF)
Quality of life measurements (SF-36, EQ-5D and CCS SAF) at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months after one and/or two ablation procedures
Time frame: 18 MONTHS
Correlation of AF burden to symptoms and quality of life changes
Correlation of AF burden to symptoms and quality of life changes
Time frame: 18 Months
Improvement in AF burden by > 90% post ablation procedure
Improvement in AF burden by \> 90% post ablation procedure
Time frame: 18 months
Relationship of ablating all atrial arrhythmias versus ablation of only targeted endpoints on long term outcome
Relationship of ablating all atrial arrhythmias versus ablation of only targeted endpoints on long term outcome
Time frame: 18 months
Cut off of AF burden that affects the Quality of Life measurement
Cut off of AF burden that affects the Quality of Life measurement
Time frame: 18 months
Evaluation of cost utility
Evaluation of cost utility
Time frame: 18 months