This study aims to examine the antidepressant efficacy of riluzole, employing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adjunctive trial in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD).
This study aims to examine the antidepressant efficacy of riluzole, employing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8 week trial of adjunctive trial in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). Preclinical studies have shown riluzole to modulate Glu release and clearance, and to have potent neuroprotective properties, promoting neuro-resiliency. Other preclinical data now also show the drug to have antidepressant-like effects in rodent models used to screen for antidepressant activity. In addition, several small open-label clinical studies further suggest riluzole has antidepressant and anxiolytic properties, even in patients who do not respond to standard monoaminergic antidepressant and anxiolytic medications.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
104
Yale University, Yale Depression Research Program
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Massachussettes General Hospital, Depression Clinical and Research Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression
Time frame: 4 weeks of therapy (baseline to week 4)
Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression
Time frame: 4 weeks of therapy (week 4 to week 8)
Responders Having at Least a 50% Improvement in MADRS Compared to the Baseline
Responders having at least a 50% improvement in MADRS compared to the baseline in the sequential parallel design
Time frame: 8 weeks therapy
Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE-SI)
A commonly used instrument originally developed by NIMH and adapted into a self-report instrument. The version of the scale that we plan to use examines in a systematic fashion all possible treatment-emergent side effects and probes specific adverse symptoms, including suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and self-injurious behavior. Presented below are counts of people that had experienced the event by 8 weeks.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 8 weeks