A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of the Ottawa Influenza Decision Aid

Overview

The purpose of this study is to determine whether, among healthcare personnel who are undecided about whether to receive influenza vaccine, does use of the OIDA increase or decrease their confidence in their decision to be immunized? Furthermore, does the use of the OIDA affect the intent of the healthcare personnel to be immunized or not immunized?

Influenza is one of the leading causes of acute respiratory infection and results in significant increases in average life-years lost, hospital lengths of stay and outpatient clinic visits, representing an enormous economic burden for many countries. Healthcare personnel are at particularly high risk of exposure to influenza as they are exposed in both the community and in the workplace. Influenza vaccination for healthcare personnel has been shown to reduce patient mortality in long-term care facilities as well as employee absenteeism and financial costs in acute care settings. The Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommends that influenza immunization programs strive to immunize at least 90% of eligible recipients. In fact, NACI regards influenza immunization of healthcare personnel with direct patient care responsibilities as an essential component of the standard of care for the protection of patients. They consider the refusal of healthcare personnel without contraindications to receive influenza vaccine as a failure in their duty of care to patients. Despite national recommendations and proven effectiveness, influenza immunization coverage rates among healthcare personnel remain disappointingly low. In Canada, coverage rates among healthcare personnel range from 26-61% while in the US only 38% of healthcare personnel were immunized in 2002. The decision to accept or refuse influenza vaccine each year may be a difficult one for many healthcare personnel. Decisional conflict, a term used to describe the difficulty experienced by an individual who simultaneously tends to both accept and reject a given course of action, occurs in many medical decisions where the best choice often differs depending on how individuals weigh the risks and benefits, and has been shown to contribute to poor vaccine uptake. In a review of literature from 1985 to 2004, it was found that healthcare personnel experience decisional conflict related to misperceptions about influenza, its risks, the role of healthcare personnel in its transmission to patients, and the importance and risks of vaccination. Patient decision aids are tools that help people become involved in decision making by providing information about the options and outcomes, and clarifying personal values. They are designed to complement, rather than replace, counselling from a health practitioner. The use of decision aids has been shown to decrease decisional conflict and result in improved knowledge, more realistic expectations of benefit/risks and more active participation of individuals in decision-making. To date, no decision aids have been published that focus on influenza vaccination and none have been developed for healthcare personnel. Furthermore, the effect of a decision aid on the uptake of vaccine in healthcare personnel is unknown. The peer-reviewed Ottawa Influenza Decision Aid (OIDA) was developed to respond to the aforementioned misconceptions and identify barriers of vaccine uptake in healthcare personnel. The OIDA presents evidence-based information and guides the individual through the decision-making process, including deliberation of personal values and beliefs.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (2)

Outcomes