Brain metastases are the most common adult intracranial tumor, occurring in approximately 10% to 30% of adult cancer patients, and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The most widely used treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases is whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The use of WBRT after resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proven to be effective in terms of improving local control of brain metastases. RapidArc (RA) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) is a new method of delivering radiation that uses "arcs" to deliver highly conformal intensity modulated three dimensional dose distributions. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate an alternative strategy for giving WBRT with highly focal boost to gross visible lesions in patients with brain metastasis. Given the limitations of the SRS boost technique, the purpose of our investigation is to evaluate an alternative strategy for giving WBRT with highly focal boost to gross visible lesions in patients with brain metastasis. In this study, we plan to assess the tolerability of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) on patients with brain metastasis to simultaneously treat the entire brain with a concomitant focal boost to grossly identified lesions on MRI scan to try to improve local control and reduce neurocognitive toxicities. This previous version of this study was a phase I dose escalation trial giving 25 Gy in 10 fractions to the whole brain with simultaneous infield boost (SIB) to a total of 45 Gy in 10 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease. Prior to this, patients were enrolled onto one of two cohorts with whole brain dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions with SIB to total of 45 Gy in 10 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease or whole brain dose of 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with SIB to total of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease. A total of 12 patients have been previously enrolled on this trial. No patients have experienced a dose limiting toxicity (grade 3 or above) at least possibly due to study therapy. Also, no patients experienced local brain failure/progression at a site of treated metastatic brain disease. Based on this, we no longer feel that dose escalation to the gross brain disease is warranted and would proceed with a single arm pilot study treating patients with 25 Gy in 10 fractions to the whole brain with simultaneous infield boost (SIB) to a total of 45 Gy in 10 fractions to gross brain metastatic disease.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
22
Using volumetric modulated arc therapy to give simultaneous infield boost to gross metastatic brain lesions during whole brain radiation therapy.
Emory University Hospital Midtown
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Percent of Participants With Locoregional Control of Treating Brain Metastasis Patients
The cumulative incidences of recurrence locally and in the whole brain were reported at the patient level.
Time frame: Locoregional control at 1 year
Brain Progression-free Survival
Defined as period of time from study entry to to death from any cause or brain tumor recurrence or progression.
Time frame: 11 months median follow up period.
Overall Survival
Defined time from study entry to death from any cause.
Time frame: 11 months median follow up period.
Neurocognitive Effects
Neurological test score were assessed using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT). In the HVLT 12 words are read and the participant is asked to recall them, this is completed 3 times. Total words recalled are summed to give a score for Total Recall (0-36, higher scores demonstrated better recall). Delayed recall is conducted 20-25 minutes later on the same list of 12 words (scored 0-12 with higher scores demonstrating better recall). Retention is calculated as the percent of words recalled (scored 0-100, higher scores representing better recall). Recognition Discrimination is tested by a series of yes/no responses from the participant identifying 12 target words from a list of 24 and calculated by the number of true positives minus the number of true negatives with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: 11 months median follow up period.
Quality of Life as Measured by the FACT-Br Subscales
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) were summed to create the FACT brain trial outcome index (FACT-BR TOI), FACT general (FACT-G), and FACT brain total (FACT-BR Total). Three FACT scales were calculated. The higher the value the better the score, i.e., the better the quality of life perceived by patient. FACT BR TOTAL (FACT-G + BrCS, possible range 0 - 200) FACT-BR TOI (Trial Outcome Index = Physical Well Being \_ Functional Well Being +BrCS, possible range 0 - 148) FACT-G (Fact General, possible range 0 - 108)
Time frame: 11 month median follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.