The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of r-hLH to r-hFSH in the late follicular phase of young women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation.
While the role of FSH is considered the fundamental driver of folliculogenesis, the role of LH in this process is more controversial. FSH is associated with stimulating growth and recruitment of follicles while LH is associated with the selection of dominant follicles destined for ovulation. We will use an open, prospective, cross-over study to compare the safety and efficacy of two different treatment protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation in egg donors. 20 participants will undergo two cycles of stimulation. The first one will be with r-hFSH though the cycle and the second with r-hFSH then r-hLH. The participants will have 1 month rest cycle between the treatment cycles. r-hFSH doses will be adjusted according to patient response. r-hLH dosing will begin when there are 2 follicles greater than or equal to 14mm in diameter. The does will be 300IU/day and continue until the day of r-hCG administration.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
r-hFSH dose to be determined by the patient's primary doctor and adjusted according to their response
Patients will begin r-hLH at 300IU/day when there are 2 follicles greater than or equal to 14mm.
Reproductive Medicine Assoicates of New Jersey
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
Safety and efficacy of r-hFSH protocol
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of r-hFSH for controlled ovarian stimulation in the same patients.
Time frame: 6 months
Safety and efficacy of r-hFSH + r-hLH protocol
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of r-hFSH for controlled ovarian stimulation in the same patients.
Time frame: 6 months
Number of oocytes retrieved
Evaluation of the number of oocytes obtained as a function of stimulation protocol.
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of embryos obtained
Evaluation of pregnancy rates (clinical and ongoing), delivery rates, multiple pregnancy rates and the number of cancelled cycles.
Time frame: 6 months
Incidences of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Evaluation of the potential adverse effects associated with ovarian stimulation
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of oocytes obtained
Evaluation of the quality of oocytes obtained as a function of stimulation protocol.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.