Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenging procedure. Even in experienced centres, repeat interventions are necessary in up to 70 of patients to achieve sinus rhythm at a long-term follow-up. While there is a consensus to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as a cornerstone for the ablation of paroxysmal and persistent AF ablation, different additional ablation strategies are used to achieve a modification of the substrate that perpetuates the arrhythmia: linear lesions (anterior and roof lines) or ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). In the stepwise approach PVI, CFAE ablation and/or LL are combined according to the presenting arrhythmia during procedure. The aim of the study is to determine whether there is a difference in terms of freedom from arrhythmia between a stepwise approach and a linear ablation for repeat procedure in patient with recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
130
Stepwise approach for repeat AF ablation
Linear ablation for AF ablation
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Munich, Germany
RECRUITINGFreedom from atrial arrhythmia
Documented freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AF or AT) during follow-up.
Procedural and safety data
1. Duration of left atrial procedure, ablation time, fluoroscopy time. 2. Complications 3. Type of recurrent arrhythmia 4. Number of reablation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.