A diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)has significant implications for the future health of the mother. GDM is often the culmination of years of unrecognized and unmodified diabetes risk factors that lead to overt and occult clinical manifestations during pregnancy. Systematic reviews of older studies conclude that 35-60% women with gestational diabetes will develop type 2 diabetes (DM2) at rates much greater than control groups who did not have glucose intolerance during pregnancy. Liraglutide may potentially delay disease progression in GDM considering the beta -(ß-)cell function improvement in DM2 and ß-cell mass shown to increase in animal models. This study will examine if the addition of liraglutide to metformin therapy is more effective than metformin alone in improving insulin sensitivity and normalizing insulin secretion in at-risk overweight/obese women with prior GDM.
Gestational diabetes is often the culmination of years of unrecognized and unmodified diabetes risk factors that lead to overt and occult clinical manifestations during pregnancy. . Despite the high and increasing rate of type 2 diabetes in Louisiana, the medical community does not have reliable estimates of the number of woman living in southern Louisiana who develop diabetes subsequent to GDM. Systematic reviews of older studies conclude that 35-60% women with gestational diabetes will develop type 2 diabetes at rates much greater than control groups who did not have glucose intolerance during pregnancy. The higher rates were in studies of particular ethnic groups in the U.S. Recently, follow-up programs elsewhere also have identified increasing rates of type 2 diabetes by 5-10 years after GDM: 9-43% type 2 diabetes in Europe and 11-21% in Asia. The frequency of type 2 diabetes is influenced by BMI, weight gain after pregnancy, family history of diabetes, fasting and postchallenge glucose levels during and after pregnancy, postpartum insulin resistance and inadequate β-cell secretion, and the need for pharmacological treatment during pregnancy. However, the risk factors are unable to predict all cases of subsequent type 2 diabetes: the biggest risk factor is a GDM pregnancy. Presently, in the literature, there are described new, more efficient methods of diabetes prevention in groups with a high risk of this disorder, which involve both, lifestyle modification and pharmacological therapies. Lifestyle intervention was found to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes by 58% and metformin by 31% as compared with placebo. The use of rosiglitazone in subjects with prediabetes resulted in a 60% reduction of the diabetes incidence rate. Studies are needed for optimal postpartum and long-term health of women who have had GDM. Considerable recent evidence suggests that incretin-based therapies may be useful for the treatment of DM2 because continuous administration of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) produces substantial improvements in glucose control and ß-cell function in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Infusion of GLP-1 improves first and second-phase insulin secretion suggesting that early GLP-1 therapy may preserve ß-cell function in subjects with IGT or mild DM2. Whereas native GLP-1 has a very short half-life, the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide has a prolonged action (t1/2=13 h) suitable for once-daily injection. Liraglutide may potentially delay disease progression in GDM considering the ß-cell function improvement in DM2 and ß-cell mass shown to increase in animal models. This study will examine if the addition of liraglutide to metformin therapy is more effective than metformin alone in improving metabolic parameters in at-risk overweight/obese women with prior GDM
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
153
Metformin plus Placebo Metformin 500 mg qd 2 weeks 500 mg bid 2 weeks 500 mg am, 1000 mg pm- 2 weeks 1000 mg bid -98 weeks (end study) Placebo-start 1 injection SC QD step up to a max dose as tolerated
Metformin XR-500 qd for 2 weeks, 500 mg bid 2 weeks; 500 mg am, 1000 mg pm- 2 weeks - 1000 bid final dose Liraglutide- start 0.6 mg SC QD step up to 1.2 mg to a max dose of 1.8 mg SC QD as tolerated during the 4-wk non-forced dose-escalation period ( maximum allowed dose of 1.8 mg SC QD)
Woman's Hospital
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index (IS-SI)
IS-SI in liraglutide-metformin (LIRA-MET) therapy compared to metformin alone (PLacebo-MET)
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)
Fasting glucose levels in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Mean Glucose During OGTT (MBG)
MBG derived from average glucose measured during OGTT in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
HOMA-IR, a measure of insulin resistance derived from fasting values, in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Matsuda Insulin Sensitivity Index Derived From OGTT
OGTT- derived insulin sensitivity index in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Insulinogenic Index (IGI) /HOMA-IR
IGI/HOMA-IR, a measure of early insulin response corrected by fasting insulin resistance, in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Absolute Body Weight
Body weight in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to End of Study (Expressed as % Compared to Baseline)
Change in body weight from baseline to end o f study in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group. The number was derived from final weight minus baseline and normalized to a percent.
Time frame: Change from baseline (time 0) to study end (84 weeks)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI, a measure of total body adiposity, in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Waist Circumference (WC)
Waist size (measure of truncal adiposity) with LIRA-MET compared to PL-MET
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)
Waist circumference divided by hip circumference (a measure of central adiposity) in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Waist to Height Ratio (WHtR)
Waist circumference divided by height (measure of body fat distribution) in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Total Cholesterol (CHOL) Levels
CHOL levels in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) Levels
HDL-C levels in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Levels
LDL-Cholesterol levels in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Triglyceride (TRG) Levels
TRG concentrations in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Triglyceride to High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio TRG/HDL-C)
TRG/HDL-Cholesterol levels in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Systolic Blood Pressure
SBP in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Diastolic Blood Pressure
DBP in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels
Hepatic enzyme, ALT, associated with insulin resistance, in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
The hepatic marker, AST, associated with insulin resistance in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
Alanine Aminotransferase /Aspartate Aminotransferase (ALT/AST) Ratio
ALT/AST ratio, used to assess liver function in LIRA-MET group compared with PL-MET group
Time frame: 84 weeks of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.