Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Superficial Vein Thrombosis

Overview

The aim of the study is to establish whether treatment of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) with low-molecular-weight heparin in preventive or therapeutic doses prevents disease progression and thromboembolic events (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), whether efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin differs with regard to the dosage used (prevention, treatment), and to recognize groups of patients in which treatment with heparin is most efficient, as well as to determine factors that influence the efficacy of SVT treatment with heparin.

Until recently thrombophlebitis was regarded as a benign and self-limiting disease. Recent studies have shown that various complications, especially vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism, often accompany SVT. An observational study (Prospective Observational Superficial Thrombophlebitis - POST) showed that three months after onset of the disease thromboembolic events occurred in 10% of patients: pulmonary embolism in 0.4%, disease progression in 3.1% and disease recurrence in 1.9% of patients. Therefore, SVT is now frequently regarded as a part of the thromboembolic syndrome. On the basis of the evidence referred to above anticoagulants, especially heparin, are used more and more often for treatment of SVT instead of anti-inflammatory drugs and non-steroidal antirheumatics. Several studies performed so far have examined the efficacy of standard and low-molecular-weight heparin in various doses, but no final conclusion on the efficacy of treatment of SVT with heparin has been established yet. A study by Marchiori and colleagues showed that 8-12-day treatment of SVT with preventive and therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin significantly reduces progression and relapse of the disease, but not its thromboembolic complications. Another study demonstrated that low-molecular-weight heparin in combination with elastic compression was not significantly more effective than compression alone. Comparison of preventive and therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin given to patients over the period of one month after disease onset showed no differences in the efficacy in prevention of disease progression and thromboembolic complications. The standard (unfractionated) heparin was also shown to be effective in preventing disease progression, however, but not in preventing thromboembolic complications. It is also not clear how long the treatment with heparin should last. So far only one study compared the efficacy of treatment with various doses of low-molecular-weight heparin from one month to three months' duration; it demonstrated that 1-month treatment with lower doses of heparin was as effective as 3-month treatment with therapeutic doses of heparin. A recent study (CALISTO) compared the efficacy of preventive doses of fondaparinux (2.5 mg) with placebo in more than 3,000 patients with SVT and concluded that anticoagulant treatment of SVT probably does not significantly influence prevention of thromboembolic complications (Abstract presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology). Results of recent studies show that heparin (standard or low-molecular-weight heparin) in various doses prevents SVT progression, but no final agreement has emerged as to whether they prevent the occurrence of thromboembolic complications. Interpretation of the results is difficult because of the heterogeneity of the patients included in certain studies and especially because of unavailability of subgroup analyses, which would help to establish whether treatment with heparin is more effective in certain groups of patients with SVT than in those with presenting forms of the disease. Latest (2008) guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolic events adopted by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend treatment with at least preventive or median doses of low-molecular-weight heparin or standard heparin for the duration of not less than 4 weeks. This recommendation was based on a very low evidence level (level 2B). In this study, we aim to investigate whether the extensiveness of thrombophlebitis and the proximal distance of the end of a blood clot from saphenofemoral and saphenopopliteal junction influence the efficacy of SVT treatment with heparin. The investigators shall also monitor the expression of systemic inflammatory parameters that might be related to the efficacy of the treatment and progression of the disease.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes