The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative morbidity of coelioscopy versus robot-assisted coelioscopy in cervical cancer, uterus cancer and ovarian cancer.
Laparoscopic surgery, also called minimally invasive surgery (MIS), is a surgical method less invasive than classical laparoscopic open procedure. Particularly, MIS is used for resection of some gynecological cancer such as endometrial cancer, cervical cancer or ovarian cancer. Several studies demonstrated that MIS induce less surgical complications (bleeding, infections, post-operative pains...), shorter hospitalization time, earlier recovery of activity and better quality of life than laparoscopic open procedure. However, MIS is the selected method in only 9 to 25 % of gynecologic cancer surgery in France. This is likely due to the longer learning curve of MIS compared to laparoscopic open procedure. In 2001 the FDA allowed the use of robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). This technique adds some advantage to laparoscopic surgery. Indeed, surgeon operates with better precision while seated comfortably at a computer console viewing a 3-D image of the surgical field. Moreover learning curve of RALS is shorter than MIS. Comparative studies between RALS and MIS demonstrate an equivalence of these techniques for operation length and bleeding. However for surgery linked complications and time for recovery of activity, RALS had better results than MIS. Despite its expensive cost, RALS is now commonly used in North America (90% of prostatectomy and 40% of cancer linked hysterectomy). However RALS need to be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial before it's acceptation in gyneco-oncology in France. Thus, the purpose of the ROBOGYN clinical trial is to compare clinical benefit of RALS and MIS in a randomized study for patients with cancer of cervix, uterus or ovary.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
386
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André
Bordeaux, France
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux, France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, France
Perioperative morbidity at six months
To estimate the rate of complications within the first six months after surgery, according to the Clavien-Dindo and NCI CTCAE-v4.0 grading scales
Time frame: six months after surgery
Anesthesic and ventilator parameters
Description of anesthesic and ventilator parameters
Time frame: every 30 min during the surgery
Post-operative analgesia
collect of antalgic treatments
Time frame: at 24h, 48h after sugery and until discharge
Surgeon's ergonomy
according to Borg and NASA-TLX scales
Time frame: every hour during surgery (Borg scale), and at the end of intervention (NASA-TLX scale)
Patient-reported survey of patient health
36-item short form health Survey (SF36) : Scoring is a two-step process. First, numeric values of all items are recoded per the scoring key (for example, values are 0/100, or 0/25/50/75/100 depending the items). All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores: physical functioning, Role functioning/physical, Role functioning/emotional, Energy/fatigue, Emotional well-being, Social functioning, Pain, General health, Health change. Scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered.
Time frame: until 2 years after surgery
Description of surgical procedures
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHRU Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Lille, France
CHU Limoges
Limoges, France
Institut Paoli Calmette
Marseille, France
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, France
Polyclinique KenVal
Nîmes, France
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, France
Polyclinique Courlancy
Reims, France
...and 7 more locations
operative time (overall intervention, incision or "skin-to-skin", robot).
Time frame: during surgery
Progression-free survival
delay between the date of randomization and the date of the following event: local relapse, regional relapse, metastasis or death.
Time frame: until 2 years after surgery
Anatomopathology
rate of exeresis with histologically healthy resection margins (R0), number of lymph nodes removed.
Time frame: during surgery