The purposes of this study are to determine whether administering escalating doses of cetuximab in patients with no early skin toxicity could delay the progression of disease in a significant proportion of patients and to study the molecular signatures of response.
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common form of cancer worldwide and remains a leading malignancy both in incidence and mortality. In the light of existing knowledge, the investigators propose a phase II open label, two arm study in patients presenting with K-Ras wild-type metastatic colorectal tumours in the first line setting. The standard combination of irinotecan plus infusional 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) and cetuximab will be given to all patients entering the study. As the investigators hypothesize that increasing the dose of cetuximab might increase the intensity of skin reactions that directly correlates with outcome, in patients experiencing no skin toxicity, the dose of cetuximab will be escalated from 250 mg/m2 to 350 mg/m2 and then up to 500 mg/m2, in order to better define the effect of dose escalation in the first-line setting in a K-Ras wild type tumour population and in an attempt to increase efficacy. Pharmacokinetic studies will be performed to document PK parameters of cetuximab in patients from both arms in selected centers. Translational research studies are planned for all patients. Some more in depth molecular testing will be performed in a subset of patients from whom three serial tissue samples from accessible metastases by biopsy are available.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
108
Dose, frequency \& treatment mode: 400 mg/m2 (loading at day 1) followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly (at day 8 and 15) Arm allocation at day 22: Patients with skin toxicity grade 0 will follow an increasing dose schedule: on days 22 and 29 they will receive 350 mg/m2 and from day 36 onwards, 500 mg/m2 weekly
Dose, frequency \& treatment mode: 400 mg/m2 (loading at day 1) followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly (at day 8 and 15) Arm allocation at day 22: Patients with skin toxicity grade 1-4 or other significant toxicity who are not eligible for dose escalation will continue on the standard dose of cetuximab: 250 mg/m2 weekly.
PFS Probability Rate at 9 Months in the Dose Escalation Arm
A precise estimate (+/- 10%) of the probability of not having progression at 9 months. This measure is an estimation derived from the Kaplan-Meier algorithm and does not represent a dimple percentage of participants.
Time frame: 9 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Median Time
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. All patients (ITT).
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Median Time for Resected Patients
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. This is the subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment or after progression on treatment were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'. Patients were not censored at time of surgery.
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time for Resected Versus Non-resected Patients (Hazard Ratio)
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. This is the subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment or after progression on treatment were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'. Patients were not censored at time of surgery.
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Universitätsklinik für Innere medizin, Klinishe abteilung für hämatologie und Onkologie
Innsbruck, Austria
LKH Leoben, abteilung f. innere Medizin
Leoben, Austria
AKH Linz, Innere Medizin 3, Zentrum für Hämatologie und medizinishe Onkologie
Linz, Austria
Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Univ. Klinik für innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum der PMU
Salzburg, Austria
Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, 1 medizinishe Abteilung
Vienna, Austria
St Vincent Krankenhaus Betriebs GmbH
Zams, Austria
Imelda Ziekenhuis
Bonheiden, Belgium
Erasme Hospital
Brussels, Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
Brussels, Belgium
AZ Middelares Gent
Ghent, Belgium
...and 20 more locations
Death Rates by 3 Years Follow-up
Deaths by 3 years follow-up after last cetuximab administration + 30 days. All patients (ITT).
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Overall Survival (OS) Median Time
Overall survival was considered from start of treatment to death. All patients (ITT).
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Overall Survival (OS) Median Time for Resected Patients
Overall survival was considered from start of treatment to death. Subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, End point description: Clinical trial results 2009-009992-36 version 1 EU-CTR publication date: Page 15 of 38 200-03-001, and 600-01-038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study.
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Overall Response
Overall response is defined as the best tumor response on treatment of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (CR + PR). Tumor response is based on the CT/MRI assessments of target and non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions as per RECIST criteria. All patients (ITT).
Time frame: Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Overall Response in Patients With Liver-limited Disease
Overall response is defined as the best tumor response on treatment of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (CR + PR). Tumor response is based on the imaging (CT/MRI) assessments of target and non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions as per RECIST criteria. Subset of patients with liver-limited disease.
Time frame: Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Disease Control
Disease control is defined as a best response on treatment (e.g. till end of treatment evaluation) of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) (CR + PR + SD). RECIST criteria (CT/MRI). All patients (ITT).
Time frame: Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Disease Control in Patients With Liver-limited Disease
Disease control is defined as a best response on treatment (e.g. till end of treatment evaluation) of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) (CR + PR + SD). RECIST criteria (CT/MRI). Subset of patients with liver-limited disease.
Time frame: Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Duration of Response
The duration of response in responding patients is defined as the time interval from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR/PR during treatment to either the first time disease progression is documented or death. Subset of responders.
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Duration of Response in Liver-limited Disease Patients
The duration of response in responding patients is defined as the time interval from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR/PR during treatment to either the first time disease progression is documented or death. Subset of responders among patients with liver-limited disease.
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Resections for Metastatic Lesions
All patients were deemed non-resectable at baseline but some became resectable during or posttreatment. All patients (ITT). Only those patients in whom resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed were considered as 'resected'. Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, 200-03-001, and 600-01-038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'.
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
R0 Rate (Free of Tumor After Resection for Metastatic Lesions)
Rate of patients free of tumor after surgery. Subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, 200-03-001, and 600-01- 038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'.
Time frame: Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Skin Toxicity (Safety)
Treatment-emergent adverse events identified by the investigator as skin reaction or events with description skin infection or nail infection. Grading of severity was per NCI CTCAE version 4.0. All events are summarized based on the timing of occurrence per Arm in the first two rows, and worst grade per patient events are presented (following 3 rows). Grade 0 is the absence of any skin reaction and grade 3 is worst severity. All patients treated (Safety set). Note: There were 3 deviations from arm allocation rules based on the occurrence of skin toxicity. Detailed data is available upon request.
Time frame: From signature of informed consent to last cetuximab administration on study plus 30 days for each patient, an average of 9.5 months.
Laboratory Safety Assessments
Severe laboratory abnormalities (hematology and biochemistry grade 3 and higher). Worst grade per patient. All patients treated (Safety set).
Time frame: From signature of informed consent to last cetuximab administration on study plus 30 days for each patient, an average of 9.5 months.
Deaths Till 30 Days From Last Cetuximab Administration
Deaths of all causes occuring between the signature of consent and the date of last cetuximab administration + 30 days are listed per arm. None of these fatalities were deemed related to the investigational drug.
Time frame: From signature of informed consent to last cetuximab administration on study plus 30 days for each patient, an average of 9.5 months.