A Comparative Study of Global 12 Lead Electroencephalogram to Frontal SedlineTM Electroencephalogram

Loma Linda University31 enrolled

Overview

The fundamental reason for comparing the ability of the Frontal Sedline TM Electroencephalogram (PSA EEG) to standard Global 12 Lead Electroencephalogram (EEG) for burst suppression detection is to determine if a less expensive, less invasive and possibly more convenient bifrontal EEG monitor can be effective for evaluation of anesthesia-induced intraoperative burst suppression therapy (IBST) for cerebral protection.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

Conditions

Craniotomy Transphenoidal Pituitary Resection

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 90 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult ASA class 1-3 male or female 18-90 years of age; 2. scheduled for elective craniotomy in the LLUMC University Hospital, for which the surgeon has requested intraoperative burst suppression therapy; 3. capable of understanding and signing informed consent; 4. willing to have dual EEG monitoring. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age under 18 years; 2. emergency or trauma situation requiring craniotomy; 3. surgical approach that prohibits placing the SEDLineTM array on the forehead; 4. known sensitivity to the adhesives on the SEDLineTM array; 5. lack of availability of standard EEG monitoring; 6. patients with seizure disorders and refusal of consent.

Locations (1)

Loma Linda University

Loma Linda, California, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Correlation between 4 channel PSA EEG and a global 12 lead EEG

The primary outcome measure is correlation between 4 channel frontal PSA EEG pattern and standard global 12 lead EEG during IBST.

Time frame: 24 hours

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.