The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of an experimental device that introduces microscopic channels into the skin. Creating microscopic channels in the skin allows for better absorption of various medications applied to the skin, and this study will determine if the study device offers a tolerable method by which to introduce these holes. The study population will include 54 individuals, ages 18-74 years old, with a roughly equal distribution of skin colors. Each subject will have a total of three visits 24 hours apart from one another. The study device will be applied at the Baseline and Day 1 visits. At various timepoints before and after device application, skin assessments for irritation will be completed using a 7-point Skin Reaction Scale and photographs will be taken. Subjects will report pain associated with device application using a standardized pain scale. At the baseline visit, a member of the research staff will administer applications of the study device on the side of the subject's forehead, temple and the area below and to the side of the nose on randomly selected sides of the face. The side of the face at each location not receiving application of the study device will receive applications of a "dummy" device. Subjects will not be informed of which device is the study device and which is the "dummy" device. At the Day 1 visit, a member of the research staff will administer study device applications to the center of the subject's forehead. The subject will also self-apply the study device to the chin, under the instruction of the research staff member. At the Day 2 visit, final skin assessments will be made and the subject will be evaluated and treated for any persistent skin irritation. Differences in skin irritation between sites of study device application and "dummy" device application will be determined, as well as several other endpoints.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
54
A member of the research staff will apply the study device to the subject's lateral forehead, temple and nasolabial area on randomly selected sides of the face, 3 times at each anatomical location, for a total of 9 applications. All subjects will also receive 9 adjacent applications to the central forehead, and they will self-administer 3 adjacent applications to the chin under instruction of study staff.
The side not receiving application of the study device at each anatomical location will receive a comparable number of applications of a sham device.
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Local skin reaction scores
Difference in median local skin reaction scores between Study Device side and Control side for any of the three facial application sites at any of the seven follow-up times.
Time frame: 48 hours
Median pain scores
Difference in median pain scores between Study Device side and Control side for any of the three facial application sites.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Local skin reaction and reported pain central forehead
Reported pain and change in skin irritation at the central forehead site.
Time frame: 24 hours
Local skin reaction score and reported pain chin
Reported pain and change in skin irritation at the chin site.
Time frame: 24 hours
Max difference in skin reaction score
Maximal difference in local skin reaction score at any follow-up visit
Time frame: 48 hours
Subject questionnaire differences
Reported differences in skin irritation or side-effects reported per patient questionnaire
Time frame: 48 hours
Differences between skin type groupings
Differences in reported pain or changes in local skin reaction score at central forehead site between the 3 Fitzpatrick skin type groupings (I-II, III-IV and V-VI).
Time frame: 48 hours
Differences between age groups
Differences in reported pain or changes in local skin reaction score at central forehead site between 3 age groupings (18-35, 36-60, 61-74).
Time frame: 48 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.