The purpose of this research project was to systematically compare two widely used types of intervention programs for children with autism within a parent training model. In one condition, randomly assigned children were provided with an intervention that typically results in acquisition of expressive words in a large percentage of children diagnosed as having autism, using a well-documented manualized intervention focused on verbal expressive communication only (Pivotal Response Training, PRT). In the other condi¬tion, randomly assigned children received a widely used intervention on the same social communication functions using a well-documented manualized augmentative system of intervention (Picture Exchange Communica¬tion System, PECS) that has been reported to produce verbal and nonverbal communication in large percentages of children diagnosed with autism. Children in the two conditions were compared for development of verbal and nonverbal communication, changes in disruptive behavior, changes in symptoms of autism, and general adaptive behavior gains. In addition, parent satisfaction and stress measures were gathered in order to assess the effects of each intervention on family functioning.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
39
Naturalistic behavioral protocol designed to teach vocal communication.
Pictorially-based behavioral protocol designed to teach communication to nonverbal children via pictures icons.
University of California, San Diego Psychology Department
La Jolla, California, United States
University of California, Santa Barbara, School of Education, Department of Clinical, Counseling, and School Psychology
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Mullen Scales of Early Learning
Time frame: 23 weeks with three months follow-up
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales
Time frame: 23 weeks and 3 month follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.