Health-promoting effects of physical exercise are well-investigated especially for endurance activities. However, for different individuals, positive effects have different sizes, even non-responders are observed. Other forms of training, such as strength training and interval training, are less well investigated. Therefore, a comparative longitudinal training study is warranted to examine differences of preventive effects (outcome measures: ergometric descriptors of physical performance, established risk factors and prognostic factors for cardiovascular diseases) of continuous endurance training, interval training and strength endurance training. In a second stage, the observed non-responders will perform a different type of training (cross-over). It is expected, that besides a comparative general efficacy evaluation of the three training types, improved recommendations for optimized individualization of training parameters can be formulated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
266
two different endurance programs and one strength endurance program
unchanged lifestyle
Institute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, Saarland University, Bldg. B 8-2, 66123 Saarbrücken
Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany
VO2 max
determined during treadmill testing
Time frame: 6 months
resting heart rate
Time frame: 6 months
resting blood pressure
Time frame: 6 months
blood lipid profile
ratio: total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.