Main hypothesis: there is no difference between stroke volume measurements recorded by a new noninvasive finger cuff system (NexFin) and invasive hemodynamic monitoring systems as Picco2-system, FloTrac and transesophageal echocardiography
In high risc patients undergoing orthopedic surgery an extended cardiopulmonary observation improves patients safety and postoperative outcome. Therefore invasive procedures as Picco2-system, FloTrac and transesophageal echocardiography (tee) have the advantage to measure or calculate stroke volume. Disadvantage of this treatments is the need for a vascular access with all its complications. In this study the stroke volume measured by a new noninvasive finger cuff system (NexFin) should be validated in comparison to invasive hemodynamic monitoring systems as Picco2-system, FloTrac and tee.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
noninvasive finger cuff system
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte / Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin, Germany
stroke volume
Time frame: preinduction, 3 and 15 minutes after induction, before and after a volume challenge, 30 minutes after induction, end of surgery
mean arterial pressure
Time frame: preinduction, 3 and 15 minutes after induction, before and after volume challenge, 30 minutes after induction, end of surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.