This study will evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Therapeutic Education System (TES), a computer-based, psychosocial treatment program, relative to standard care when offered to individuals with substance use disorders in prison settings. The study will assess the comparative effectiveness of these interventions primarily by examining changes in: (1) substance use (e.g., weeks of abstinence), (2) HIV risk behavior (evaluated as both sex-related and drug-related HIV risk behavior) and (3) reincarceration rates. The study will also examine the extent to which these interventions improve psychosocial functioning (e.g., employment, health, and psychological status) and quality of life, and promote relevant skills acquisition (e.g., improve communication skills, reduce "criminal thinking"). The investigators predict significantly better outcomes for E vs. C due to TES' research-based content and use of proven informational technologies.
The majority of individuals in criminal justice settings across the U.S. have a critical need for science-based, psychosocial treatment that targets substance use and HIV risk behavior. The investigative team has developed and demonstrated the efficacy of an interactive, computer-based, psychosocial treatment pro-gram, the Therapeutic Education System (TES), which can answer this need. TES is theoretically grounded in evidence-based psychosocial treatments (Community Reinforcement Approach and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), and employs state-of-the-art, proven informational technologies and multimedia learning tools to promote skills acquisition, experiential learning and behavioral change. This computer-based therapeutic tool allows complex interventions to be delivered with fidelity to the evidence-based model and at low cost due to its self-directed nature (e.g., minimal staff time/training needed), thus offering considerable potential for future sustainability and dissemination within criminal justice systems. The study employs random assignment of incarcerated male and female offenders with substance use disorders (N=526) to either (1) TES (N=263), or (2) Standard Care (N=263), in a multi-site trial conducted in 8 prison substance abuse programs. Along with NDRI (the applicant organization), the collaborating study sites (University of California Los Angeles, Temple University, and the University of Kentucky) operate Research Centers that belong to the Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJDATS) network, a NIDA-funded cooperative agreement, which has established relationships with criminal justice partners from Departments of Corrections across the U.S. Aim 1 is to test the comparative effectiveness of TES vs. Standard Care on measures of drug use (e.g., weeks of abstinence) and HIV risk behavior (both sex-related and drug-related HIV risk behavior) at 3- and 6-months post prison discharge, as well as on reincarceration rates using official Department of Corrections records. Aim 2 is to evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of TES relative to standard care. The investigators predict that TES will be significantly more effective and cost effective than Standard Care. The project is significant in its use of an innovative, computer-based technology and in its potential to produce a major increase in the effective and cost-effective delivery of science-based psychosocial treatment to substance-abusing offenders in prison, and thereby make a considerable public health contribution. Thus, funding the proposed 2-year project can markedly accelerate the pace and achievement of research and dissemination efforts to meet the needs of the U.S. correctional community by providing effective and practical treatment interventions for its large substance-abusing population.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
376
Therapeutic Education System (TES) is an interactive, computer-based, psychosocial treatment program. TES is theoretically grounded in evidence-based psychosocial treatments (Community Reinforcement Approach and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy).
Psycho-educational and psycho-social approaches to substance use disorders (commonly offered in prison settings) delivered by counselors in group formats.
Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility
Cañon City, Colorado, United States
Four Mile Correctional Center
Cañon City, Colorado, United States
Fremont Correctional Facility
Cañon City, Colorado, United States
Denver Women's Correctional Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Trinidad Correctional Facility
Model, Colorado, United States
La Vista Correctional Facility
Pueblo, Colorado, United States
Sterling Correctional Facility
Sterling, Colorado, United States
Blackburn Correctional Complex
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
SCI Cambridge Springs
Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania, United States
Airway Heights Corrections Center
Airway Heights, Washington, United States
Time Line Follow Back for Drug and Alcohol Use (Sobell et al., 1996)
Measure for substance use.
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
Urinalysis
To detect any change in illicit drug use.
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
Risk Behavior Survey (Booth et al., 1993)
To assess both drug-related and sex-related HIV risk behavior.
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
DOC record systems
To provide the reincarceration status of each participant.
Time frame: At an average of 11 months post-prison release
Coping Strategies Scale
Measures skills acquisition, such as problem solving and dealing with urges to use substances of abuse (Litt et al., 2005), and psychosocial functioning
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
Addiction Severity Index-Lite
Measures areas of health status improvement, psychological status, family/social relationships, and employment. (www.tresearch.org)
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
The Treatment Services Review instrument (McLellan et al., www.tresearch.org)
Used to investigate the role of treatment services received post-release (in aftercare).
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
Brief Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (BriefDATCAP)
Measures for the cost effectiveness analyses.
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
EuroQol EQ5D (QOL) (the EuroQol Group, 1990)
Describes and value health-related quality of life and for constructing Quality-Adjusted Life Year estimates (QALYs).
Time frame: 6 months post-prison release
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.