This is a Phase III, randomized, unblinded, multicenter, prospective comparative study. The purpose of this study is to test whether exercise or stress management training delivered to autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients prior to transplantation can improve functional status and the transplant experience.
Background: The adverse effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) on short and long term quality of life are well documented. Patients experience numerous aversive symptoms (e.g., nausea, fatigue, and sleep disturbance) that are accompanied by declines in physical and mental well-being. Although most longitudinal studies show return to baseline functioning for the majority of patients, it may take 6 to 12 months or longer to reach this goal. Clinical trials have shown that training in stress management techniques and participation in formal exercise programs each offered in isolation are effective in improving quality of life in patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy and HCT. Review of these studies suggests that stress management interventions primarily improve mental health outcomes and nausea. The impact of exercise training interventions is more variable; most studies report physical health benefits, with some studies also reporting mental health benefits. Small studies suggest that combining stress management training and exercise are feasible and well-tolerated, but whether the combination provides an additive or synergistic impact on quality of life outcomes has not been directly investigated. Design Narrative: The protocol is designed as a factorial trial with two interventions, exercise and stress management, which results in four treatment arms: standard care, exercise only, stress management only and the combination of exercise and stress management. The primary objective of this randomized phase III trial is to test the ability of exercise training or stress management training to improve physical and mental functioning at Day 100 post hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
711
Participants assigned to the Exercise arm will receive a packet of materials from the study interventionist, along with a brief personalized introduction to the home-based exercise intervention.
Participants will receive a packet of materials from the study interventionist, along with a brief (10 minute) standardized introduction to the self-administered intervention.
Participants will receive a packet of materials from the study interventionist, along with a brief (15 minute) personalized introduction to the interventions.
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
Functional Status
To determine whether exercise or stress management improves self-reported physical and mental functioning compared to standard care at 100 days post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using evaluated patients. The Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of the SF-36 will be the primary endpoint measures of functional status. Raw scores are converted to a standard metric (0-100), with higher scores being indicative of a better health state.
Time frame: 100 days
Symptoms
Patients will complete the MOS 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), a widely used self-report measure designed to assess perceived health and functioning, contains eight scales: Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (R-P); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Mental Health (MH); and Role-Emotional (R-E). Scales are comprised of different numbers of items and use a variety of rating formats. Raw scores are converted to a standard metric (0-100), with higher scores being indicative of a better health state.
Time frame: 100 days
Cancer and Treatment Distress (CTXD)
Cancer and treatment distress will be measured by the acute version of the Cancer and Treatment Distress (CTXD) scale, a 27 item validated measure of distress with domains of Uncertainty, Health Burden, Family Strain, Identity and Managing the Medical System used extensively in HCT studies. The scale ranges from 0 - 3, where a higher score reflects more distress.
Time frame: 100 days
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a widely used seven item self-report measure of sleep patterns and difficulties. A modified version will be used to obtain self-reports of the following for the past week: sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and use of sleeping medications. The scale ranges from 0 - 21, where a higher score reflects worse sleep quality.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Patients randomized to standard care only will be informed of their assigned condition and receive the DVD.
University of Florida College of Medicine
Gainesville, Florida, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Blood & Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Washington University, Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
...and 9 more locations
Time frame: 100 days
Nausea
Two questions using a similar format as the SF-36 were added to measure nausea. The scale ranges from 1 - 5, where a higher score indicates worse nausea.
Time frame: 100 days
Days of Hospitalization
The number of hospital days within the first 100 days after graft infusion will be collected for patients surviving at least 100 days.
Time frame: 100 days
SF-36 Late Outcomes
The SF-36 PCS and MCS will be collected from participants at six months. Raw scores are converted to a standard metric (0-100), with higher scores being indicative of a better health state.
Time frame: 6 months
Survival
Both survival at 6 months and overall survival at last follow-up will be reported. Overall survival is defined as the interval between transplantation and death or last follow-up. Patients alive when the study closes or lost to follow up are censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year