In this study, the investigators purpose is to evaluate the adaptation of treatment with early response based on PET scan results after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, for patient aged from 18 to 80 years, with low IPI DLBCL. This is an open randomized study. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the 3 years PFS with the aim to demonstrate the non inferiority of the experimental arm in comparison to standard arm: In standard arm, the patients will receive 6 cycles of R-CHOP 21 without taking into account of PET scan results after 2 cycles. In experimental arm, early good responder patients (defined as having a negative PET scan after 2 cycles, confirmed after 4 cycles) will receive only 4 cycles of R-CHOP 21. In both arms, if the PET scan remains positive after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, a biopsy exam is needed to confirm the failure and an intensive chemotherapy is then recommended. All of the patients, in both arms, will have an early evaluation with PET scan. All PET scan will be reviewed by a group of expert according to Deauville criteria defined by Meignan et al to adapt the decision after the 2nd cycle in experimental arm and after the 4th cycle for all patients. The final evaluation of response will be made according to 2007 Cheson's criteria.
Localized stages DLBCL with low IPI (aaIPI = 0) have a very good prognostic after a standard immuno-chemotherapy with 6 cycles of R-CHOP 21. Five years PFS is estimated over 75%, whatever the age of the patient. PET scan is actually considered as "the gold standard" for the initial staging and the evaluation of response after treatment. With this new technique, the response criteria have been redefined by Cheson and al. in 2007. Moreover, several recent studies showed that early evaluation of response with PET scan after only 2 cycles of chemotherapy was accurate to define two groups of patients: "Early-good-responders", when PET scan is negative "Early-poor-responders", when PET scan remains positive Prognostic for the first group is very good, and for the second poorer. At the present time, the interest of the modification and/or the intensification of the treatment for the early-poor-responder patients is not demonstrated by any publication. New studies are ongoing for patients with advanced stages of DLBC NHL (GELA trial LNH 07-3B) or Hodgkin's lymphoma (GELA and EORTC trial H10); the aim is to evaluate a new strategy of treatment adapted to early response criteria. No trial has already been made for low IPI DLBCL. In this study, the investigators purpose is to evaluate the adaptation of treatment with early response based on PET scan results after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, for patient aged from 18 to 80 years, with low IPI DLBCL. This is an open randomized study. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the 3 years PFS with the aim to demonstrate the non inferiority of the experimental arm in comparison to standard arm: In standard arm, the patients will receive 6 cycles of R-CHOP 21 without taking into account of PET scan results after 2 cycles. In experimental arm, early good responder patients (defined as having a negative PET scan after 2 cycles, confirmed after 4 cycles) will receive only 4 cycles of R-CHOP 21. In both arms, if the PET scan remains positive after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, a biopsy exam is needed to confirm the failure and an intensive chemotherapy is then recommended. All of the patients, in both arms, will have an early evaluation with PET scan. All PET scan will be reviewed by a group of expert according to Deauville criteria defined by Meignan et al to adapt the decision after the 2nd cycle in experimental arm and after the 4th cycle for all patients. The final evaluation of response will be made according to 2007 Cheson's criteria.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
650
Prednisone-60 mg/m2: D1 D2 D3 D4 D5;Rituximab-375 mg/m2 : D1; Doxorubicin-50 mg/m2 D1;Cyclophosphamide-750 mg/m2:D1 Vincristine-1.4 mg/m2 :D1; G-CSF SC -5 microg/kg/day: D6 to D13
ZNA Stuivenberg
Antwerp, Belgium
A. Z. Sint-Jan
Bruges, Belgium
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Belgium
Université Libre de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme
Brussels, Belgium
Université Catholique de Louvain Saint Luc
Brussels, Belgium
Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
Progression Free Survival
Evaluate by PFS at 3 years the non-inferiority of a chemotherapy treatment with 4 or 6 cycles of R-CHOP 21, determined according to early response assessed by PET at the end of 2 cycles versus standard chemotherapy of 6 cycles of R-CHOP 21 in patients with DLBCL lymphoma CD20+ with no factors of the IPI age adjusted.
Time frame: 3 years
DELTA SUV
Determine the decrease of SUV max between PET at baseline, PET after cycle 2 and PET after cycle 4 and evaluate the changes predictive interest.
Time frame: 3 weeks post C4 last patient
Overall Survival, EFS, response duration, DFS
Assess the overall survival, the EFS (Event Free Survival - events defined as death from any cause, relapse for complete responders and undocumented complete responders, progression during or after treatment, initiation of a new anti-lymphoma therapy), the response duration, and the DFS for complete responders (disease free survival).
Time frame: 3 years
prognostic impact of the existence of a high tumor burden at diagnosis (> 10 cm) on PFS
Evaluate the prognostic impact of the existence of a high tumor burden at diagnosis (\> 10 cm).
Time frame: 3 years
biological factors
Identify the biological factors on blood samples and on tumor biopsy influencing the patient treatment response and prognosis.
Time frame: 3 weeks post last cycle and 3years survival
Overall Response Rate
Evaluate the overall response rate according to IWC (International Harmonization Project - Cheson 2007) (CR, PR) after 4 or 6 cycles of R-CHOP21 according to the treatment arm.
Time frame: 3 weeks post last cycle last patient
Rate of good responders according to results at PET after C2
Evaluate the rate of negative PET2
Time frame: 3 weeks post C2 last patient
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Charleroi, Belgium
UZ Gent
Ghent, Belgium
Hôpital Jolimont
Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium
CHU de Liège
Liège, Belgium
Clinique Saint Joseph
Mons, Belgium
...and 73 more locations