The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of alogliptin compared to placebo when given alone or as add-on therapy to metformin or add-on to pioglitazone (with or without metformin).
Diabetes is a chronic illness associated with microvascular complications such as nephropathy (kidney disease), retinopathy (eye damage) and neuropathy (nervous system damage). Diabetes is also associated with macrovascular complications including cardiovascular disease (heart disease), stroke and peripheral vascular disease (narrowing or blockage of blood vessels). These complications are associated with reduced quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. Takeda is developing SYR-322 (alogliptin) for improvement of glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Evaluations of alogliptin and its clinical efficacy have been conducted in multiple countries including the United States and Japan. This study will be conducted as a multi-center clinical trial in order to validate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin on type 2 diabetes population within Asia. Participants who qualified for the study were stratified into 1 of the 3 therapy groups based upon their background antidiabetic therapy before being randomized 1:1 to receive either alogliptin 25 mg once daily or matching placebo once daily. * Monotherapy group - patients who had been treated with diet and exercise for at least 2 months prior to screening. * Add-on to metformin therapy group - patients who had been treated with metformin for at least 3 months and at a stable dose (≥1000 mg/day) for at least 8 weeks prior to screening. * Add-on to pioglitazone therapy group - patients who had been treated with a stable dose of pioglitazone alone or in combination with metformin at a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to screening.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
506
Alogliptin tablets
Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets.
Stable metformin dose
Unnamed facility
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Unnamed facility
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Unnamed facility
Xiamen, Fujian, China
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 16. Least squares means are derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the metformin therapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the pioglitazone therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16.
Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time
The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. Least squares means are derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the metformin therapy, baseline HbA1c with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the pioglitazone therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time
The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. Least squares means are derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline FPG as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline FPG with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the metformin therapy, baseline FPG with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the pioglitazone therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16.
Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia
Marked Hyperglycemia was defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Stable pioglitazone dose
Unnamed facility
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Unnamed facility
Haikou, Hainan, China
Unnamed facility
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Unnamed facility
Jingzhou, Hubei, China
Unnamed facility
Shiyan, Hubei, China
Unnamed facility
Changsha, Hunan, China
Unnamed facility
Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
...and 11 more locations
Time frame: Randomization to Week 16.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
The change between body weight measured at Baseline and body weight measured at Weeks 8 and 16. The least squares means are derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect, and baseline body weight as a covariate for the monotherapy, baseline body weight with baseline metformin dose as covariates for the add-on to metformin therapy, baseline body weight with baseline metformin therapy status and baseline pioglitazone dose as covariates for the add-on to pioglitazone therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 16.
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5% at Week 16
Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) less than or equal to 6.5% at Week 16.
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤7.0% at Week 16
Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) less than or equal to 7.0% at Week 16.
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤7.5% at Week 16
Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) less than or equal to 7.5% at Week 16.
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥ 0.5%
Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 0.5% at Week 16.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥1.0%
Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.0% at Week 16.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥1.5%
Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.5% at Week 16.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16.
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in HbA1c ≥2.0%
Clinical response was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 2.0% at Week 16.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16.