Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIP) is a rare and severe delayed peripheral nerve complication of radiotherapy, that is spontaneously irreversible with no medical treatment to limit or reduce symptoms. The investigators planed in RIP a randomized double blind clinical trial, using a pentoxifylline (P)- tocopherol (E)- clodronate combination versus placebo, to assess a possible symptomatic regression by a sensory-motor neurological quantifiable and reproducible score (modified Subjective Objective Medical management Analytic, SOMA). The investigators previously developed a successful PE treatment in symptomatic RI injuries via the antioxidant pathway, in clinical phase II and III trails and experiments obtaining a major significant radiation-induced fibrosis regression, then the PE clodronate combination (PENTOCLO), obtaining a rapid and significant healing of mandible osteoradionecrosis and significant neurological signs regression (- 35% modified SOMA score at 18 months) in 50 partial RIP. The aim of this phase III randomized clinical trial is to show PENTOCLO efficiency and its tolerance in long survival patients irradiated before for cancer and presenting with partial RIP of upper or lower legs. The investigators calculated to include 60 patients to show a significant clinical difference between the two groups after 18 months of treatment: PENTOCLO\[Pentoxifylline 400 (2x/d) + vitamine E 500 (2x/d) + intermittent Clodronate 800 (2/d, 5d/7)\] versus triple placebo, with prednisone 20 (2d/7) for all patients. RIP is assessed before treatment and every 6 months by a standardized sensory-motor neurological (SOMA 95 modified by NCI-CTC 99) score used for main criteria at M18, and various neurological scales of assessment (Visual Analog Scale for pain / VAS for paresthesia, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory \[NPSI\], Overall Disability Sum Score \[ODSS\], muscle testing, Nine hole peg test / Timed 25-Foot Walk), quality of life (SF36, Patient Global Impression of Change and Clinical Global impression of Change \[PGIC/ CGIC\]) and electrophysiology.
The aim of this phase III randomized clinical trial is to show PENTOCLO efficiency and its tolerance in long survival patients irradiated before for cancer and presenting with partial RIP of upper or lower legs. We calculated to include 60 patients to show a significant clinical difference between the two groups after 18 months of treatment: PENTOCLO \[Pentoxifylline 400 (2x/d) + vitamine E 500 (2x/d) + intermittent Clodronate 800 (2/d, 5d/7)\] versus triple placebo, with prednisone 20 (2d/7) for all patients. RIP is assessed before treatment and every 6 months by a standardized sensory-motor neurological (SOMA 95 modified by NCI-CTC 99) score used for main criteria at M18, and various neurological scales of assessment (Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\] for pain / VAS for paresthesia, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory \[NPSI\], Overall Disability Sum Score \[ODSS\], muscle testing, Nine hole peg test / Timed 25-Foot Walk), quality of life (SF36, Patient Global Impression of Change and Clinical Global impression of Change \[PGIC/ CGIC\]) and electrophysiology.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
59
Placebo for pentoxifylline 400 mg, 1 cp twice a day (7d/7)
Pentoxifylline 400 mg: 1 cp twice a day (7d/7)
Tocopherol alpha-acetate, 500 mg: 1 capsule twice a day (7d/7)
Clodronate disodium (clodronic acid) 800 mg: 2 cp per day, 5d/7 (from monday to friday)
Placebo for Tocopherol alpha-acetate, 500 mg: 1 capsule twice a day (7d/7)
Placebo for clodronate disodium (clodronic acid) 800 mg: 2 cp per day, 5d/7 (from monday to friday)
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, France
Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris, France
Sensory-motor neurological clinical assessment
Sensory-motor neurological clinical assessment of RIP patients as measured with SOMA scale (Subjective Objective Medical management Analytic involving tools) modified by NCI-CTC99 scale
Time frame: 18 months
Pain VAS
Visual analog scale for pain
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
NPSI scale
NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) pain scale to assess neuropathic pain by a self-questionnaire \[Reference: Bouhassira et al. Development and validation of the neuropathic pain symptom inventory. Pain 2004;108(3):248-57\]
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Paresthesia VAS
Visual analog scale for paresthesia
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Frequence of paresthesia
Evaluated on a 4-item scale: * Never * Occasional (several times each week or month) * Intermittent (several times a day) * Permanent (all day long and night)
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
ODSS
Overall disability sum score: Checklist for upper limb (5 items) and lower limb (7 items)
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Muscle testing
Semi-quantitative manual muscle strength assessment on a 0 to 5 scale, separately for each muscle.
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Neurological examination
Evaluation of sensitivity, motricity and reflex
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Motor assessment of complex movements
Evaluated by two separate tests according to upper vs lower limb involvement: * Nine Hole Peg test for brachial injury * Timed 25-Foot Walk for lower limb symptoms
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Quality of life
Global quality of life as evaluated by SF36 questionnaire
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Global clinical impression
Patient global impression of change (PGIC) and clinical global impression of change (CGIC)
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Electromyography
Electromyography of upper / lower limbs
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Clinical symptoms evaluation
Clinical evaluation looking for upper digestive disorders (nausea, vomiting, epigastralgia), lower digestive disorders (diarrhea), vascular disorders (cephalalgia, vertigo, flush, deep asthenia), bleeding (hematoma)
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Biological evaluation
evaluation of biological parameters: blood cell count, platelets, sedimentation velocity, C-reactive protein, prothrombin time, TCK, calcemia, protidemia, LDH, creatininemia, phosphokinase creatine (CPK)
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
Cardiovascular evaluation
As evaluated by: * Heart rate * Blood pressure lying and standing after 5 minutes orthostatism * Electrocardiogramm
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.