The intrauterine device (IUD) is a long-acting, highly effective, reversible contraceptive that may be underutilized due to fear of pain during insertion. Although providers frequently prescribe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for IUD insertion, there is no evidence for any pain reduction. In fact, no interventions evaluated in randomized controlled trials have been shown to be effective in reducing pain during IUD insertion. While many women tolerate IUD insertion well, others have moderate to severe pain. This double-blind randomized controlled trial of 150 women aims to estimate the efficacy of intracervical 2% lidocaine gel compared to placebo (KY jelly) to reduce IUD insertion pain. Our hypothesis is that women who are treated with 2% lidocaine gel prior to IUD insertion will have reduced pain as measured on a 0 mm to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). We will be able to detect a 15 mm difference on the VAS with our sample size. Other data to be collected include information regarding age, BMI, obstetric history, lactation status, time since pregnancy or delivery, last menstrual period, history of cervical conization, anxiety levels, anticipated pain levels, insertion characteristics (time, difficulty, complications), side effects, and satisfaction with pain control. If 2% lidocaine gel is effective, then a viable, easily administered option for pain control will be available to providers and patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
150
120mg lidocaine x 1
Inert gel x 1
Women's Primary Care Center/Women and Infants' Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Womens Primary Care Center
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Mean Pain Score During IUD Insertion
0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, higher values represent more pain.
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.