Usually the treatment of a single brain metastasis is surgery or Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Surgery involves resection of the brain tumor by means of an operation, whereas SRS is treatment consisting of highly focused radiation doses to the tumor. These two treatment modalities are both widely used, well established, and proven to improve survival, but so far, no study has been done to directly compare the efficacy of one over the other. Neither treatment in itself is considered to be experimental and both have been shown to provide benefits to patients with metastatic brain tumors. The aim of this study is to determine which two modalities are better for local control and improving quality of life. Patients who consent to this study will be randomized to either receive surgery or Radiosurgery in the treatment of single brain metastases. The study seeks to recruit 12 patient to each group. Patients will be in this study for up to five years from the time of the treatment finished. This will include follow-up visits at 4 weeks after the procedure and then every 3 months after the procedure up to 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Prior to surgery, patients will have placement of scalp fiducials and undergo a contrast enhanced MRI scan. Once the patient is anesthetized or sedated, the head will be secured with a head frame and scalp fiducials will be registered to the stereotactic neuronavigation system. The tumor will then be resected and the patient will be taken to the recovery unit.
This will be delivered using Gamma Knife technology. Patients randomized to this arm will be fitted with a stereotactic head-frame for stereotactic localization of brain metastases.
To determine the feasibility of accrual to a randomized trial of SRS vs Surgery in patients with single brain metastasis.
Time frame: 2 years
To compare the incidence of recommendation for a second local therapeutic intervention to the treated metastasis at 1 year.
Time frame: 2 years
To compare overall survival between the two randomized cohorts.
Time frame: 2 years
To compare local-recurrence-free survival between the two randomized cohorts.
Time frame: 2 years
To compare CTCAE v 3.0 neurological outcomes
Time frame: 2 years
To evaluate difference in neurocognitive outcomes
Time frame: 2 years
To measure and compare quality of life
Time frame: 2 years
To determine adverse effects attributable to local therapy
Time frame: 2 years
To compare medication requirements in each cohorts (steroids, anticonvulsants)
Time frame: 2 years
To explore potential predictive factors of outcomes
Time frame: 2 years
To investigate potential biofluid and imaging biomarkers of response
Time frame: 2 years
To compare ECOG performance status
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.